Proposed changes Jan 2026 #31
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
Signed-off-by: Adam Gutglick <adam@spiraldb.com>
AdamGS
force-pushed
the
adamg/add-things-december-2025
branch
from
94b4cac to
bc34ac5
Compare
whelanBoyd
approved these changes
Jan 29, 2026
whelanBoyd
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 29, 2026
* Add Jan update Signed-off-by: Whelan Boyd <whelanboyd@gmail.com> * Clean up GPU support Signed-off-by: Whelan Boyd <whelanboyd@gmail.com> * Proposed changes Jan 2026 (#31) Signed-off-by: Adam Gutglick <adam@spiraldb.com> * Add latest GPU work Signed-off-by: Whelan Boyd <whelanboyd@gmail.com> --------- Signed-off-by: Whelan Boyd <whelanboyd@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Adam Gutglick <adam@spiraldb.com> Co-authored-by: Adam Gutglick <adamgsal@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Included @gatesn's proposed changes. WDYT about splitting the DuckDB line into a subsection of "Around the Ecosystem" like I did for DF?
I would love to keep shouting out specific changes (thought vortex-data/vortex#6049 was pretty cool), but that seems unsustainable, so maybe it makes sense to make the DF section shorter.