Skip to content

Conversation

@gatesn
Copy link
Contributor

@gatesn gatesn commented Nov 7, 2025

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Gates <nick@nickgates.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Gates <nick@nickgates.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Gates <nick@nickgates.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Gates <nick@nickgates.com>
@gatesn gatesn added the changelog/chore A trivial change label Nov 7, 2025
@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Nov 7, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #5244 will degrade performances by 14.12%

Comparing ngates/batch-execute (be5724d) with develop (ee4b921)1

Summary

❌ 60 regressions
✅ 1258 untouched
🆕 7 new
⏩ 162 skipped2

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Benchmarks breakdown

Benchmark BASE HEAD Change
chunked_dict_primitive_canonical_into[f32, (1000, 10, 10)] 90.1 µs 103.3 µs -12.79%
chunked_dict_primitive_canonical_into[f32, (1000, 10, 100)] 695.5 µs 806.2 µs -13.73%
chunked_dict_primitive_canonical_into[f32, (1000, 100, 10)] 94.2 µs 107.4 µs -12.3%
chunked_dict_primitive_canonical_into[f32, (1000, 100, 100)] 711.8 µs 822.6 µs -13.46%
chunked_dict_primitive_canonical_into[f32, (1000, 1000, 10)] 111.9 µs 125 µs -10.5%
chunked_dict_primitive_canonical_into[f32, (1000, 1000, 100)] 901.5 µs 1,010.7 µs -10.8%
chunked_dict_primitive_canonical_into[f64, (1000, 10, 10)] 118.1 µs 131.2 µs -10.02%
chunked_dict_primitive_canonical_into[u32, (1000, 10, 10)] 90.1 µs 103.1 µs -12.65%
chunked_dict_primitive_canonical_into[u32, (1000, 10, 100)] 715.9 µs 822.8 µs -13%
chunked_dict_primitive_canonical_into[u32, (1000, 100, 10)] 91.8 µs 104.9 µs -12.45%
chunked_dict_primitive_canonical_into[u32, (1000, 100, 100)] 719 µs 825.7 µs -12.92%
chunked_dict_primitive_canonical_into[u32, (1000, 1000, 10)] 109.5 µs 122.7 µs -10.76%
chunked_dict_primitive_canonical_into[u32, (1000, 1000, 100)] 900.2 µs 1,007.5 µs -10.65%
chunked_dict_primitive_canonical_into[u64, (1000, 10, 10)] 118.2 µs 131.5 µs -10.11%
chunked_dict_primitive_into_canonical[f32, (1000, 10, 10)] 90.9 µs 104.1 µs -12.74%
chunked_dict_primitive_into_canonical[f32, (1000, 10, 100)] 718.4 µs 826 µs -13.03%
chunked_dict_primitive_into_canonical[f32, (1000, 100, 10)] 92.2 µs 105.3 µs -12.46%
chunked_dict_primitive_into_canonical[f32, (1000, 100, 100)] 734.1 µs 842.4 µs -12.85%
chunked_dict_primitive_into_canonical[f32, (1000, 1000, 10)] 114 µs 127.3 µs -10.43%
chunked_dict_primitive_into_canonical[f32, (1000, 1000, 100)] 904.1 µs 1,010.1 µs -10.5%
... ... ... ... ...

ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.

Footnotes

  1. No successful run was found on develop (33e8cf0) during the generation of this report, so ee4b921 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report.

  2. 162 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 7, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 50.00000% with 19 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 84.29%. Comparing base (33e8cf0) to head (be5724d).
⚠️ Report is 165 commits behind head on develop.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
vortex-array/src/array/operator.rs 50.00% 19 Missing ⚠️

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@gatesn gatesn closed this Nov 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

changelog/chore A trivial change

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants