chore[vortex-expr]: allow Arced ref to the rewrite rule

[joseph-isaacs]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 86.87783% with 29 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 85.94%. Comparing base (63aa58c) to head (4ebada7).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on develop.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
vortex-array/src/expr/transform/simplify_typed.rs	77.41%	14 Missing ⚠️
vortex-array/src/expr/session/rewrite.rs	88.00%	9 Missing ⚠️
vortex-array/src/expr/transform/simplify.rs	90.19%	5 Missing ⚠️
vortex-array/src/expr/transform/optimizer.rs	83.33%	1 Missing ⚠️

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[robert3005]

seems reasonable

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #5401 will improve performances by 10.17%

_{Comparing ji/arc-rule-list (4ebada7) with develop (e25c0a2)}

Summary

⚡ 1 improvement
✅ 1420 untouched
🆕 7 new
⏩ 680 skipped¹
🗄️ 28 archived benchmarks run²

Benchmarks breakdown

	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Change
🆕	decompress[("alp_for_bp_f64", 0x4635aa0)]	N/A	24.2 ms	N/A
🆕	decompress[("datetime_for_bp", 0x4638960)]	N/A	34.9 ms	N/A
🆕	decompress[("dict_fsst_varbin_bp_string", 0x4637ca0)]	N/A	14.5 ms	N/A
🆕	decompress[("dict_fsst_varbin_string", 0x4637800)]	N/A	14.5 ms	N/A
🆕	decompress[("dict_varbinview_string", 0x46364c0)]	N/A	14.7 ms	N/A
🆕	decompress[("for_bp_u64", 0x4635350)]	N/A	2.5 ms	N/A
🆕	decompress[("runend_for_bp_u32", 0x4636950)]	N/A	2 ms	N/A
⚡	dict_compress_string	97.8 ms	88.8 ms	+10.17%

Footnotes

1. 680 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

2. 28 benchmarks were run, but are now archived. If they were deleted in another branch, consider rebasing to remove them from the report. Instead if they were added back, click here to restore them. ↩