[DO NOT MERGE] Rewrite the Vortex benchmarks website

[connortsui20]

A MINIMUM of 2 weeks to do this if someone (me) decides to do this, simply due to the amount of data migration, benchmarks + CI refactoring, and of course the website itself (actually getting it to work + making it look nice).

Maybe this is overkill but to be honest anything less than this that fulfills the same goals we want will still take forever so the opportunity cost is not actually that high imo.

You don't have to read the whole thing to get the idea, probably just the first 300 lines and then skim the rest of the document.

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 46.94%

_{Comparing ct/benchmark-website-redesign (fa06185) with develop (13f120f)}

⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected

Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.

For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.

Summary

⚡ 3 improved benchmarks
❌ 8 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1251 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 1290 skipped benchmarks¹

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

	Mode	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
❌	WallTime	u16_FoR[10M]	6.2 µs	11.6 µs	-46.94%
⚡	WallTime	u8_FoR[10M]	71.7 µs	11.2 µs	×6.4
⚡	Simulation	canonical_into_nullable[(10000, 100, 0.0)]	4.9 ms	4.1 ms	+19.79%
⚡	Simulation	canonical_into_nullable[(10000, 10, 0.0)]	528.5 µs	444.1 µs	+19.03%
❌	Simulation	into_canonical_non_nullable[(10000, 100, 0.0)]	1.9 ms	2.7 ms	-29.42%
❌	Simulation	into_canonical_non_nullable[(10000, 100, 0.1)]	3.8 ms	4.6 ms	-17.7%
❌	Simulation	into_canonical_non_nullable[(10000, 100, 0.01)]	2.2 ms	3 ms	-27.05%
❌	Simulation	into_canonical_nullable[(10000, 100, 0.0)]	4.4 ms	5.2 ms	-15.62%
❌	Simulation	canonical_into_non_nullable[(10000, 100, 0.0)]	1.9 ms	2.7 ms	-29.75%
❌	Simulation	canonical_into_non_nullable[(10000, 100, 0.1)]	3.7 ms	4.5 ms	-18.15%
❌	Simulation	canonical_into_non_nullable[(10000, 100, 0.01)]	2.1 ms	2.9 ms	-27.39%

Footnotes

1. 1290 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

[joseph-isaacs]

would be nice to build in the cpu/io used. e.g. ec2 type and s3 or nvme.

[connortsui20]

That would need to be a separate chart(s) right? Otherwise I don't know how you would display all the information