feat[cuda]: filter for Decimal/VarBinView

[a10y]

• Wire in BufferHandles for VarBinView
• Wire up cub filtering logic for decimals/strings

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 24.72%

_{Comparing aduffy/filter-decimals (cc6afa5) with develop (68130ce)¹}

⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected

Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.

For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.

Summary

⚡ 54 improved benchmarks
❌ 6 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1101 untouched benchmarks
🆕 18 new benchmarks
⏩ 1323 skipped benchmarks²

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

	Mode	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
🆕	WallTime	1M_90pct[1000000]	N/A	56.8 µs	N/A
🆕	WallTime	1M_90pct[1000000]	N/A	59.3 µs	N/A
🆕	WallTime	10M_90pct[10000000]	N/A	199.7 µs	N/A
🆕	WallTime	10M_10pct[1000000]	N/A	219.7 µs	N/A
🆕	WallTime	10M_10pct[1000000]	N/A	133 µs	N/A
🆕	WallTime	10M_50pct[5000000]	N/A	279.5 µs	N/A
❌	WallTime	u64_values_u8_codes[10M]	220 µs	259.4 µs	-15.21%
🆕	WallTime	1M_50pct[500000]	N/A	24 µs	N/A
🆕	WallTime	10M_10pct[1000000]	N/A	219.1 µs	N/A
🆕	WallTime	1M_10pct[100000]	N/A	22.8 µs	N/A
🆕	WallTime	1M_50pct[500000]	N/A	50.7 µs	N/A
🆕	WallTime	10M_50pct[5000000]	N/A	280 µs	N/A
🆕	WallTime	1M_90pct[1000000]	N/A	30.2 µs	N/A
❌	WallTime	u8_FoR[10M]	6.9 µs	9.2 µs	-24.72%
🆕	WallTime	10M_90pct[10000000]	N/A	363.4 µs	N/A
🆕	WallTime	10M_50pct[5000000]	N/A	162.1 µs	N/A
🆕	WallTime	1M_10pct[100000]	N/A	44.8 µs	N/A
🆕	WallTime	10M_90pct[10000000]	N/A	362.6 µs	N/A
🆕	WallTime	1M_10pct[100000]	N/A	44.2 µs	N/A
🆕	WallTime	1M_50pct[500000]	N/A	49.4 µs	N/A
...	...	...	...	...	...

ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.

Footnotes

1. No successful run was found on develop (db2e2af) during the generation of this report, so 68130ce was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

2. 1323 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩