Skip to content

feat[cuda]: SequenceArray#6232

Merged
a10y merged 3 commits intodevelopfrom
aduffy/seq-cuda
Feb 2, 2026
Merged

feat[cuda]: SequenceArray#6232
a10y merged 3 commits intodevelopfrom
aduffy/seq-cuda

Conversation

@a10y
Copy link
Contributor

@a10y a10y commented Jan 30, 2026

No description provided.

@a10y a10y force-pushed the aduffy/seq-cuda branch 5 times, most recently from f95d5ec to 9724e6d Compare February 1, 2026 18:30
a10y added 2 commits February 2, 2026 10:28
Signed-off-by: Andrew Duffy <andrew@a10y.dev>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Duffy <andrew@a10y.dev>
@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Feb 2, 2026

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 33.09%

Comparing aduffy/seq-cuda (cab43e1) with develop (782d650)

Summary

❌ 1 regressed benchmark
✅ 1137 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 1384 skipped benchmarks1

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
Simulation chunked_bool_into_canonical[(1000, 10)] 43 µs 64.3 µs -33.09%

Footnotes

  1. 1384 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

@a10y a10y added the changelog/feature A new feature label Feb 2, 2026
Signed-off-by: Andrew Duffy <andrew@a10y.dev>
@a10y a10y marked this pull request as ready for review February 2, 2026 16:01
@a10y a10y merged commit 941edaa into develop Feb 2, 2026
43 of 46 checks passed
@a10y a10y deleted the aduffy/seq-cuda branch February 2, 2026 16:22
AdamGS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 2, 2026
Signed-off-by: Andrew Duffy <andrew@a10y.dev>
danking pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2026
Signed-off-by: Andrew Duffy <andrew@a10y.dev>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

changelog/feature A new feature

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants