AggregateFn naming

[gatesn]

Some naming fixes for the aggregate functions API

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 10.2%

⚡ 3 improved benchmarks
❌ 1 regressed benchmark
✅ 976 untouched benchmarks
🆕 2 new benchmarks
⏩ 1466 skipped benchmarks¹

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

	Mode	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
⚡	Simulation	take_map[(0.1, 1.0)]	4.2 ms	3.6 ms	+17.59%
⚡	Simulation	take_map[(0.1, 0.1)]	1,007.5 µs	898.8 µs	+12.1%
⚡	Simulation	take_map[(0.1, 0.5)]	2.6 ms	2 ms	+26.53%
🆕	Simulation	sequence_decompress_u32	N/A	4.1 ms	N/A
🆕	Simulation	sequence_compress_u32	N/A	5.2 ms	N/A
❌	Simulation	map_each[BufferMut<i32>, 128]	770.6 ns	858.1 ns	-10.2%

---

_{Comparing ngates/aggregate-fns (7533b0b) with develop (5d6a3c8)²}

Footnotes

1. 1466 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

2. No successful run was found on develop (a8b340a) during the generation of this report, so 5d6a3c8 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩