Skip to content

Merge planner (Task C) cost-model routing

d24e5cb
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
Open

[claude] FSST LIKE: SSA fusion, dense short-circuit, _ wildcard, ILIKE, Shift-Or, Fat Teddy, planner #7921

Merge planner (Task C) cost-model routing
d24e5cb
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
CodSpeed HQ / CodSpeed Performance Analysis failed May 14, 2026 in 0s

Performance Regression: -2.45%

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

⚡ 58 improved benchmarks
❌ 75 regressed benchmarks
✅ 992 untouched benchmarks
🆕 19 new benchmarks
⏩ 115 skipped benchmarks1
🗄️ 38 archived benchmarks run2

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
Simulation chunked_bool_canonical_into[(10, 1000)] 794.9 µs 922 µs -13.79%
Simulation chunked_bool_canonical_into[(100, 100)] 102.7 µs 116.4 µs -11.81%
Simulation chunked_bool_canonical_into[(1000, 10)] 46.8 µs 59.5 µs -21.26%
Simulation chunked_constant_i32_append_to_builder[(1000, 10)] 30.9 µs 39.5 µs -21.79%
Simulation chunked_opt_bool_canonical_into[(10, 1000)] 912.8 µs 1,143.7 µs -20.19%
Simulation chunked_opt_bool_canonical_into[(100, 100)] 205 µs 246.8 µs -16.96%
Simulation chunked_opt_bool_into_canonical[(10, 1000)] 1.4 ms 1.3 ms +10%
Simulation chunked_varbinview_into_canonical[(10, 1000)] 2.2 ms 1.9 ms +15.1%
Simulation bench_compare_primitive[(10000, 128)] 106.9 µs 120.6 µs -11.32%
Simulation bench_compare_primitive[(10000, 2)] 106 µs 118.4 µs -10.47%
Simulation bench_compare_primitive[(10000, 32)] 106.3 µs 118.9 µs -10.59%
Simulation bench_compare_primitive[(10000, 4)] 105.8 µs 119.1 µs -11.17%
Simulation bench_compare_primitive[(10000, 8)] 105.7 µs 118.6 µs -10.88%
Simulation bench_compare_sliced_dict_primitive[(1000, 10000)] 80.7 µs 93 µs -13.25%
Simulation bench_compare_sliced_dict_primitive[(2000, 10000)] 85.1 µs 98.2 µs -13.33%
Simulation bench_compare_sliced_dict_primitive[(2500, 10000)] 87.6 µs 100.9 µs -13.2%
Simulation bench_compare_sliced_dict_primitive[(3333, 10000)] 92.6 µs 105.4 µs -12.13%
Simulation bench_compare_sliced_dict_primitive[(5000, 10000)] 101.6 µs 114 µs -10.88%
Simulation encode_varbinview[(1000, 2)] 203.2 µs 164.5 µs +23.51%
Simulation bench_sparse_coverage[0.01] 366.5 µs 439.5 µs -16.61%
... ... ... ... ... ...

ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.


Comparing claude/optimize-string-lookup-KuJZB (d24e5cb) with develop (7349cd6)3

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 115 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

  2. 38 benchmarks were run, but are now archived. If they were deleted in another branch, consider rebasing to remove them from the report. Instead if they were added back, click here to restore them.

  3. No successful run was found on ji/fsst-like-paper-2-work-clean (049c79f) during the generation of this report, so develop (7349cd6) was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report.