Skip to content

refactor(VField): default slot fallback#21074

Merged
johnleider merged 1 commit intodevfrom
refactor/field-default-slot-fallback
Mar 23, 2025
Merged

refactor(VField): default slot fallback#21074
johnleider merged 1 commit intodevfrom
refactor/field-default-slot-fallback

Conversation

@johnleider
Copy link
Member

@johnleider johnleider commented Mar 6, 2025

A small QOL change for working with VField.

Description

Markup:

<template>
  <v-app>
    <v-container>
      <v-input>
        <v-field
          append-icon="$vuetify"
          label="Foobar"
          prepend-icon="$vuetify"
        />

        <v-menu activator="parent" eager>
          <v-list v-model:selected="selected">
            <v-list-item title="Foobar" value="one" />
            <v-list-item title="Foobar" value="two" />
          </v-list>
        </v-menu>
      </v-input>
    </v-container>
  </v-app>
</template>

<script setup>
  import { ref } from 'vue'

  const file = ref()
  const isFocused = ref(false)

  const selected = ref([])
</script>

it's overall a much better experience and very little to
improve the default presentation of a propless/slotless
VField
@johnleider johnleider added T: enhancement Functionality that enhances existing features C: VField labels Mar 6, 2025
@johnleider johnleider added this to the v3.8.0 (Andromeda) milestone Mar 6, 2025
@johnleider johnleider self-assigned this Mar 6, 2025
@johnleider johnleider changed the base branch from master to dev March 6, 2025 18:32
@johnleider johnleider marked this pull request as ready for review March 23, 2025 22:28
@johnleider johnleider merged commit 0a8528a into dev Mar 23, 2025
10 checks passed
@johnleider johnleider deleted the refactor/field-default-slot-fallback branch March 23, 2025 22:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

C: VField T: enhancement Functionality that enhances existing features

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

Comments