Skip to content

prepare JSON-LD 1.2 API#690

Merged
pchampin merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
prepare-json-ld12
Jun 4, 2026
Merged

prepare JSON-LD 1.2 API#690
pchampin merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
prepare-json-ld12

Conversation

@pchampin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@pchampin pchampin commented May 20, 2026

  • change version of document
  • update mentions to processing modes and values
  • update references to RDF 1.2 (assuming we align to RDF 1.2 basic)
  • TODO: update references to JSON-LD11 and JSON-LD11-FRAMING when new versions are published

Preview | Diff

- change version of document
- update mentions to processing modes and  values
- update references to RDF 1.2 (assuming we align to RDF 1.2 basic)
- TODO: update references to JSON-LD11 and JSON-LD11-FRAMING when new versions are published
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@rubensworks rubensworks left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I suppose the handling of rdfDirection (which can be set to i18n-datatype or compound-literal in 1.1) is intentionally left out of scope for this PR?

Comment thread common/terms.html Outdated
Comment thread common/terms.html
@pchampin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I suppose the handling of rdfDirection (which can be set to i18n-datatype or compound-literal in 1.1) is intentionally left out of scope for this PR?

yes. This PR started as part of my action to include processing of RDF dirLangString, but I realized that reviewing it would be easier if all these "clerical" changes were out of the way.

Co-authored-by: Ruben Taelman <rubensworks@users.noreply.github.com>
Comment thread index.html Outdated
Co-authored-by: Anatoly Scherbakov <altaisoft@gmail.com>
Comment thread index.html Outdated
@pchampin pchampin merged commit 289ebf3 into main Jun 4, 2026
1 of 3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants