Skip to content

Conversation

@afs
Copy link
Contributor

@afs afs commented Oct 23, 2025

This closes #223.
This closes #169 by referring to the irelative-iri production of the IRI grammar.

Add an informative section about minting IRIs, with defined terminology RDF Reference IRI for IRIs suitable for use in published RDF. The basic syntax of IRIs (RFC3986/7) is for other uses of IRIs and is too broad (e.g. http:abcd).

The section is "informative" because advice can not be checked or enforced when consuming published RDF. For example, the data consumer can not be assumed to know URI scheme rules.

Changes are in section 3.3.


Preview | Diff

@afs afs requested review from hartig and pchampin October 23, 2025 11:04
Copy link
Contributor

@Tpt Tpt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

Copy link
Contributor

@niklasl niklasl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great! (Tiny correction in comment; @hartig's suggestions look good too.)

@afs afs requested a review from hartig November 2, 2025 16:30
@afs
Copy link
Contributor Author

afs commented Nov 2, 2025

To make it ready for re-review, I've squashed the suggestions (several overlapped) and prepared a single commit of review comments.

Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

RDF Reference IRI Relative IRI Reference should bind to the irelative-ref production

7 participants