- 
                Notifications
    
You must be signed in to change notification settings  - Fork 9
 
RDF Reference IRI #255
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
RDF Reference IRI #255
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks great! (Tiny correction in comment; @hartig's suggestions look good too.)
| 
           To make it ready for re-review, I've squashed the suggestions (several overlapped) and prepared a single commit of review comments.  | 
    
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>
This closes #223.
This closes #169 by referring to the
irelative-iriproduction of the IRI grammar.Add an informative section about minting IRIs, with defined terminology
RDF Reference IRIfor IRIs suitable for use in published RDF. The basic syntax of IRIs (RFC3986/7) is for other uses of IRIs and is too broad (e.g.http:abcd).The section is "informative" because advice can not be checked or enforced when consuming published RDF. For example, the data consumer can not be assumed to know URI scheme rules.
Changes are in section 3.3.
Preview | Diff