Implement 'HostEnsureCanCompileStrings'. #66
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Member
Author
|
@wseltzer: According to the IPR checker, I'm not allowed to contribute to W3C specs. cough Perhaps you could poke at that? :) |
Contributor
|
Didn't we vaguely discuss using both callerRealm and calleeRealm? |
Member
Author
|
I don't recall. The caller realm seems most important, but we could check both, I guess? |
Contributor
|
Yeah, it seems like you shouldn't be able to do |
Member
Author
|
Changed to use both in 8d3e743. |
Member
|
@mikewest fixed the ipr check bug |
ryandel8834
added a commit
to ryandel8834/WebAppSec-CSP
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 13, 2022
Based on conversation at w3c/webappsec-csp#66, this seems like the safest approach given the potential difference in privilege between realms. h/t @domenic
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@annevk, @domenic: Can you take a look at this attempt to address the CSP side of whatwg/html#271 (comment)?