Conversation
This is still WIP as will make master unusable (tests will fail and the main functionality is broken). Checkout a version using a tag if you want to get the source code of a working version.
Merged
This was referenced Oct 29, 2023
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a part of major update and refactoring for the wakepy 0.8.0 release.
NOTE: This is still WIP as will make master unusable (tests will fail and the main functionality is broken). If you wish the checkout a source code of a working version, checkout using a tag.
I am merging this for better transparency; Make it easier for others to see what is being done. Also makes easier for people to help and/or give PRs etc, when the code in master is in sync. The master has not been updated 3+ months although a lot of work has been done. In addition, I'm getting rid of separate
devbranch and using singly themasterbranch (simplify workflow).It is not ideal to have a broken master, but I think this is still better than keeping the changes locally. I'm aiming to get the broken parts fixed and tests passing asap (and try to keep the master in better shape from that on).