fix(release): use GH_PAT in checkout to bypass main branch ruleset

[Copilot]

The release workflow's actions/checkout step was using the default GITHUB_TOKEN for git credentials, causing changelog pushes to main to be blocked by the branch ruleset — even though GH_PAT was already passed to release-build-flow-action.

Change

• .github/workflows/release.yml — added token: ${{ secrets.GH_PAT }} to the checkout step so git credentials are established under the PAT owner (who has ruleset bypass), consistent with what the action itself uses

- uses: actions/checkout@34e114876b0b11c390a56381ad16ebd13914f8d5
  with:
    fetch-depth: 0
    token: ${{ secrets.GH_PAT }}  # added

Without this, release-build-flow-action receives the right token for API calls but git push operations fall back to the GITHUB_TOKEN credentials set by checkout, which the branch ruleset blocks.

Original prompt

Another worry I have, since we are using github actions and we have ruleset for the main branch, the release build flow action has specific user to use to modify the changelogs will that effect it?

[Chronological Review: The conversation began with the user requesting to fix all errors in bun lint using biome. The user then specified to create a pull request (PR) to the dev branch after fixing the errors. Subsequently, the user delegated the task to a coding agent, indicating a desire for automation in handling the lint errors.]

[Intent Mapping:

1. "Fix all the bun lint errors and PR it to dev branch." - The user wants to resolve linting issues and submit changes to the development branch.
2. "Delegate: 'Delegate to cloud agent'" - The user seeks to automate the task by delegating it to an agent.]

[Technical Inventory:

• Tool: Bun Lint - A tool for identifying and fixing linting errors in code.
• Framework: Biome - A JavaScript and TypeScript linter that the user intends to use for fixing errors.]

[Code Archaeology: No specific files or code changes were discussed in detail, but the focus was on fixing lint errors in the codebase.]

[Progress Assessment: The user has outlined tasks to be completed (fixing lint errors and creating a PR) but has not yet confirmed if any actions have been executed.]

[Context Validation: The conversation captures the user's intent to fix lint errors and automate the process through delegation, which is essential for continuation.]

[Recent Commands Analysis:

• Last Agent Commands: "Fix all the bun lint errors and PR it to dev branch." and "Delegate: 'Delegate to cloud agent'"
• Tool Results Summary: No specific results were returned from tool executions as the commands were requests for actions rather than queries that would yield results.
• Pre-Summary State: The agent was preparing to delegate the task of fixing lint errors to a cloud agent when the token budget was exceeded.
• Operation Context: The commands were executed to address the user's goal of resolving linting issues efficiently.]

1. Conversation Overview: - Primary Objectives: "Fix all the bun lint errors and PR it to dev branch." and "Delegate: 'Delegate to cloud agent'" indicate the user's goal to resolve linting issues and automate the process. - Session Context: The conversation has focused on fixing lint errors in the codebase and creating a pull request to the development branch, with a recent shift towards delegating the task to an agent. - User Intent Evolution: The user initially sought to fix errors manually but later opted for delegation to streamline the process.

2. Technical Foundation:

• Bun Lint: A tool for identifying and fixing linting errors in code.
• Biome: A JavaScript and TypeScript linter intended for use in fixing errors.

3. Codebase Status:

• No specific files or code changes were discussed, but the focus remains on addressing lint errors in the project.

4. Problem Resolution:

• Issues Encountered: Linting errors in the codebase.
• Solutions Implemented: The user has requested to fix these errors and create a PR, but no solutions have been executed yet.
• Debugging Context: Ongoing efforts to resolve linting issues through delegation.

5. Progress Tracking:

• Completed Tasks: None reported yet.
• Partially Complete Work: The task of fixing lint errors is pending.
• Validated Outcomes: No features or code have been confirmed working through testing yet.

6. Active Work State:

• Current Focus: The user is focused on fixing lint errors and creating a PR.
• Recent Context: The last few exchanges involved requests to fix lint errors and delegate the task to an agent.
• Working Code: No specific code snippets were discussed recently.
• Immediate Context: The user was preparing to delegate the task of fixing lint errors when the summary was triggered.

7. Recent Operations:

• Last Agent Commands: "Fix all the bun lint errors and PR it to dev branch." and "Delegate: 'Delegate to cloud agent'"
• Tool Results Summary: No specific results were returned as the commands were requests for actions.
• Pre-Summary State: The agent was preparing to delegate the task when the token budget was exceeded.
• Operation Context: The commands were executed to efficiently address the user's goal of resolving linting issues.

8. Continuation Plan:

• [Pending Task 1]: Fix all bun lint errors and create a PR to the dev branch.
• [Pending Task 2]: Delegate the task to a cloud agent for automation.
• [Priority Information]: The most urgent task is to fix the lint errors.
• [Next Action]: Proceed with the delegation to the cloud agent to handle the linting issues.

Created from VS Code.

---

💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.

[github-actions]

📦 Package Build Flow — Monorepo Build

🔀 Pull Request Build — Pre-release package for testing PR changes

Package	Version	Status	Install
@tinyclaw/plugins	2.0.0-patch.cfae164	✅ Published	npm i @tinyclaw/plugins@2.0.0-patch.cfae164
@tinyclaw/types	2.0.0-patch.cfae164	✅ Published	npm i @tinyclaw/types@2.0.0-patch.cfae164
tinyclaw	2.0.0-patch.cfae164	✅ Published	npm i tinyclaw@2.0.0-patch.cfae164
@tinyclaw/plugin-channel-discord	2.0.0-patch.cfae164	✅ Published	npm i @tinyclaw/plugin-channel-discord@2.0.0-patch.cfae164
@tinyclaw/plugin-channel-friends	2.0.0-patch.cfae164	✅ Published	npm i @tinyclaw/plugin-channel-friends@2.0.0-patch.cfae164
@tinyclaw/plugin-provider-openai	2.0.0-patch.cfae164	✅ Published	npm i @tinyclaw/plugin-provider-openai@2.0.0-patch.cfae164

📥 Quick Install (changed packages)

npm i @tinyclaw/types@2.0.0-patch.cfae164 @tinyclaw/plugins@2.0.0-patch.cfae164 @tinyclaw/plugin-channel-discord@2.0.0-patch.cfae164 @tinyclaw/plugin-channel-friends@2.0.0-patch.cfae164 @tinyclaw/plugin-provider-openai@2.0.0-patch.cfae164 tinyclaw@2.0.0-patch.cfae164

---

This package was built automatically by the Package Build Flow action.

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

This PR fixes a GitHub Actions authentication issue in the release workflow. The release-build-flow-action was unable to push changelog updates to the protected main branch because the checkout step was using the default GITHUB_TOKEN, which is blocked by branch rulesets. The fix ensures that the same GH_PAT secret used by the release action is also used for checkout, so git credentials are established under a user with ruleset bypass permissions.

Changes:

• Added token: ${{ secrets.GH_PAT }} parameter to the actions/checkout step in the release workflow to align git credentials with the PAT used by release-build-flow-action

[github-actions]

🔥 Container Build Complete - Patch Build

Build Status: ✅ Success
Flow Type: patch
Description: Hotfix for production

---

📦 Pull Image

Docker Hub: docker pull warengonzaga/tinyclaw:patch-cfae164

GHCR: docker pull ghcr.io/warengonzaga/tinyclaw:patch-cfae164

---

📋 Build Details

Property	Value
Flow Type	patch
Commit	1c117a3
Registry	Docker Hub + GHCR

🏷️ Image Tags

• warengonzaga/tinyclaw:patch-cfae164
• ghcr.io/warengonzaga/tinyclaw:patch-cfae164

---

🔍 Testing Your Changes

1. Pull the image using one of the commands above
2. Run the container with your test configuration
3. Verify the changes work as expected
4. Report any issues in this PR

---

🚀 Quick Start

# Pull and run the container
Docker Hub: docker pull warengonzaga/tinyclaw:patch-cfae164
docker run <your-options> <image>

---

---

🔒 Security Scan Results

📋 Pre-Build Security Checks

✅ Source Code Scan: 0 vulnerabilities found
✅ Dockerfile Scan: 0 misconfigurations found

🐳 Container Image Vulnerabilities

Severity	Count
Total	0

📊 Detailed Security Reports

View detailed vulnerability reports in the GitHub Security tab.

---

_{🤖 Powered by Container Build Flow Action v1.2.0
💻 with ❤️ by Waren Gonzaga under WG Technology Labs, and Him 🙏}