Skip to content

Fix bad merge for remote server#9652

Merged
kevinyang372 merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
kevin/fix-bad-merge-for-remote-server
Apr 30, 2026
Merged

Fix bad merge for remote server#9652
kevinyang372 merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
kevin/fix-bad-merge-for-remote-server

Conversation

@kevinyang372
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@kevinyang372 kevinyang372 commented Apr 30, 2026

WISOTT

@cla-bot cla-bot Bot added the cla-signed label Apr 30, 2026
@oz-for-oss
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

oz-for-oss Bot commented Apr 30, 2026

@kevinyang372

I'm starting a first review of this pull request.

You can view the conversation on Warp.

I completed the review and posted feedback on this pull request.

Comment /oz-review on this pull request to retrigger a review (up to 3 times on the same pull request).

Powered by Oz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@kevinyang372 kevinyang372 requested a review from moirahuang April 30, 2026 19:39
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@oz-for-oss oz-for-oss Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overview

This PR updates the SSH remote-server connection path to launch the proxy via the existing remote_proxy_command, so the remote proxy receives the identity key argument.

Concerns

  • No blocking correctness, error-handling, performance, or security concerns found in the changed hunk.

Verdict

Found: 0 critical, 0 important, 0 suggestions

Approve

Comment /oz-review on this pull request to retrigger a review (up to 3 times on the same pull request).

Powered by Oz

@kevinyang372 kevinyang372 merged commit 99f80df into master Apr 30, 2026
36 checks passed
@kevinyang372 kevinyang372 deleted the kevin/fix-bad-merge-for-remote-server branch April 30, 2026 19:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants