Skip to content

Switched to new version of specs#107

Closed
philsturgeon wants to merge 8 commits intomasterfrom
feature/no-more-swagger-specs
Closed

Switched to new version of specs#107
philsturgeon wants to merge 8 commits intomasterfrom
feature/no-more-swagger-specs

Conversation

@philsturgeon
Copy link
Contributor

@philsturgeon philsturgeon commented Jul 12, 2018

With the specs finally getting their own rendering on openapis.org (instead of living only on swagger.io), lets link to them!

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 86.018% when pulling 6e42263 on feature/no-more-swagger-specs into 66bd3c2 on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jul 12, 2018

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 87.798% when pulling 7e52eb5 on feature/no-more-swagger-specs into b110a8c on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 86.018% when pulling 6e42263 on feature/no-more-swagger-specs into 66bd3c2 on master.

<a href="https://swagger.io/specification/#oasObject">{{ rule.object }}</a>
{% else %}
<a href="https://swagger.io/specification/#{{ rule.object }}Object">{{ rule.object }}</a>
<a href="https://spec.openapis.org/oas/v3.0.0.html#{{ rule.object }}-object">{{ rule.object }}</a>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is a v3.0.1.html file there if you want to link to that instead.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated! Thumb? :D

@philsturgeon
Copy link
Contributor Author

Done!

@philsturgeon
Copy link
Contributor Author

Merging as part of v0.8.2 because everyone refuses to review this one for some reason. 🤣

@philsturgeon philsturgeon deleted the feature/no-more-swagger-specs branch September 17, 2018 18:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants