-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 121
Issue/245 image in paragraph #246
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
theck13
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I had some minor comments. Everything else looks good!
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| //<<<<<<< HEAD |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good idea. We can remove this unused code too.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch, time to get rid of it.
| .any { | ||
| selectionStart == editableText.getSpanEnd(it) | ||
| } | ||
| val spanAtEndOfWhichMediaIsAdded = editableText.getSpans(selectionStart, selectionEnd, AztecBlockSpan::class.java) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It looks like spanAtEndOfWhichMediaIsAdded was renamed similar to spanAtStartOfWhichMediaIsAdded. What about naming them spanBeforeMedia and spanAfterMedia, respectively? That's easier to grok.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh yeah :) makes sense..
|
Thanks for the quick review @theck13. |
theck13
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
![]()
Fixes #245.
Can someone have a quick look so that it can be included in the release? Thanks!