Improve grammar and clarity in API Manager overview documentation

[Prethan]

This PR improves the grammar and readability of a sentence in the overview section to enhance clarity for API Manager users.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Minor formatting improvements to documentation for better consistency.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[CLAassistant]

Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
_{You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.}

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

A minor formatting cleanup in the documentation file en/docs/get-started/overview.md, removing a trailing space and adjusting HTML indentation from four spaces to a single space with no content changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Change Summary
Documentation formatting en/docs/get-started/overview.md	Removed trailing whitespace after "specification." sentence and reduced <ul> tag indentation from 4 spaces to 1 space

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• Improve clarity and grammar in overview page #10230: Also makes small documentation edits to the same en/docs/get-started/overview.md file with whitespace and formatting adjustments.

Suggested reviewers

• chamilaadhi
• tharikaGitHub

Poem

🐰 A trailing space, begone! hop hop
Indentation aligned, the cleanup won't stop
Four spaces trimmed to just one clean line,
Documentation polish—simple, sublime! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (2 warnings)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title check	⚠️ Warning	The title claims to improve grammar and clarity, but the actual changes are only whitespace/formatting adjustments with no semantic content modifications.	Revise the title to accurately reflect the nature of the change, such as 'Fix formatting in API Manager overview documentation' or remove the PR if only whitespace changes are intended.
Description check	⚠️ Warning	The description is incomplete and lacks most required template sections including Purpose, Goals, Approach, User stories, Release notes, Documentation, Testing, and Security checks.	Complete the pull request description using the repository template, providing details for Purpose, Goals, Approach, and other applicable sections.

✅ Passed checks (1 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a59311f and cd8966a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• en/docs/get-started/overview.md (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

en/docs/get-started/overview.md (1)

11-12: Clarify the scope: PR title claims grammar/clarity improvements, but changes appear to be formatting-only.

The PR title and description state that this improves "grammar and clarity in API Manager overview documentation," but the visible changes (lines 11-12) show only whitespace adjustments: removal of a trailing space and indentation normalization from 4 spaces to 1 space on the <ul> tag. No grammar or clarity improvements are evident in the provided changes.

If grammar/clarity improvements were intended, they should be reflected in the documentation content itself, not just formatting. Alternatively, if this is a formatting cleanup PR, the title should be updated to accurately reflect the scope.

Can you clarify whether this PR is meant to address grammar/clarity or if it's simply a formatting cleanup? If grammar improvements were intended, please ensure they are included in the actual content changes.

Tip

📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!

You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.

• Provide your own instructions using the high_level_summary_instructions setting.
• Format the summary however you like (bullet lists, tables, multi-section layouts, contributor stats, etc.).
• Use high_level_summary_in_walkthrough to move the summary from the description to the walkthrough section.

Example instruction:

"Divide the high-level summary into five sections:

1. 📝 Description — Summarize the main change in 50–60 words, explaining what was done.
2. 📓 References — List relevant issues, discussions, documentation, or related PRs.
3. 📦 Dependencies & Requirements — Mention any new/updated dependencies, environment variable changes, or configuration updates.
4. 📊 Contributor Summary — Include a Markdown table showing contributions:
   | Contributor | Lines Added | Lines Removed | Files Changed |
5. ✔️ Additional Notes — Add any extra reviewer context.
   Keep each section concise (under 200 words) and use bullet or numbered lists for clarity."

Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}