feat(docs): Implement comprehensive design system audit criteria and methodology

[Copilot]

This PR establishes a complete framework for auditing design system compliance across all components in the Frontend Recipeer application. The audit system ensures consistency, accessibility, and maintainability of our atomic design-based component architecture.

📋 Deliverables Completed

Core Documentation

• Audit Criteria: 100-point scoring system across 5 evaluation areas
• Scoring Methodology: Detailed instructions for consistent component evaluation
• Accessibility Checklist: Complete WCAG 2.1 AA compliance requirements
• Component Tracking Template: Spreadsheet with 40+ components pre-categorized
• Audit Report Template: Standardized reporting format
• Example Button Audit: Demonstrates methodology scoring 92/100

🎯 Audit Framework Overview

Evaluation Areas (100 points total)

1. Design Token Compliance (25 pts) - Color usage, typography scale, spacing consistency
2. Visual Consistency (25 pts) - Component variants, layout patterns, responsive design
3. Accessibility Compliance (25 pts) - WCAG 2.1 AA requirements, keyboard navigation, screen readers
4. Theme Support (15 pts) - Light/dark mode adaptation, system detection
5. Documentation Quality (10 pts) - Storybook completeness, code documentation

Component Priority Levels

• Critical (90+ required): Foundational atoms (Button, Input, Typography)
• High (80+ required): Key molecules and organisms (QuantityAdjuster, RecipeCard)
• Medium (70+ required): Complex organisms and templates
• Low (60+ required): Experimental or legacy components

🔍 Key Features

Systematic Evaluation

• Standardized 0-100% scoring system for design token compliance
• Comprehensive visual consistency rubric with specific measurement criteria
• Complete WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility checklist with testing procedures
• Theme validation criteria ensuring proper light/dark mode support

Practical Implementation

• CSV tracking template with all current components categorized by atomic level
• Detailed scoring methodology with code examples and testing processes
• Standardized audit report format with issue classification and remediation planning
• Example audit demonstrating the methodology on our Button component

Quality Assurance

• Priority-based audit scheduling aligned with component criticality
• Consistent scoring guidelines with specific measurement techniques
• Re-audit triggers and continuous improvement processes
• Integration with existing Storybook and testing infrastructure

📊 Component Coverage

The tracking template includes comprehensive coverage of our atomic design structure:

• 14 Atoms: Button, Input, Typography, etc. (Critical priority)
• 21 Molecules: QuantityAdjuster, Card, Alert, etc. (High/Medium priority)
• 7 Organisms: RecipeCard, NavigationMenu, etc. (High/Medium priority)
• Foundation Tokens: Colors, Typography, Spacing (Critical priority)

🚀 Getting Started

1. Review the audit criteria to understand evaluation standards
2. Study the Button component example to see methodology in practice
3. Use the component tracking template to plan audit schedule
4. Follow the scoring methodology for consistent evaluation
5. Reference the accessibility checklist for WCAG compliance

This framework provides the foundation for maintaining design system quality and consistency as our component library grows and evolves.

Fixes #103.

---

💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.

[github-actions]

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.2.0 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀