Skip to content

Conversation

@simonjbeaumont
Copy link
Contributor

We are already checking the signature of the patch contents, it seems silly to
also checksum the gpg binary itself. It's also becoming a bit of a maintenance
burned and cumbersome in the open source world where this checksum will be
different on every version of every distro.

Signed-off-by: Si Beaumont simon.beaumont@citrix.com

@simonjbeaumont
Copy link
Contributor Author

Forward port of #1931.

We are already checking the signature of the patch contents, it seems silly to
also checksum the gpg binary itself. It's also becoming a bit of a maintenance
burden and cumbersome in the open source world where this checksum will be
different on every version of every distro.

Signed-off-by: Si Beaumont <simon.beaumont@citrix.com>
@johnelse
Copy link
Contributor

Let's do it!

johnelse added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 12, 2014
CA-144941: Don't checksum the gpg binary
@johnelse johnelse merged commit bd68907 into xapi-project:master Sep 12, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants