-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 294
markdown: more tweaks #3124
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
markdown: more tweaks #3124
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -51,12 +51,12 @@ These types are mapped onto XML-RPC types in a straight-forward manner: | |
| </array> | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| * for types `k` and `v`, our type `(k -> v) map` maps onto an | ||
| * for types `k` and `v`, our type `(k → v) map` maps onto an | ||
| XML-RPC `<struct>`, with the key as the name of the struct. Note that the | ||
| `(k -> v) map` type is only valid when `k` is a `string`, `ref`, or | ||
| `(k → v) map` type is only valid when `k` is a `string`, `ref`, or | ||
| `int`, and in each case the keys of the maps are stringified as | ||
| above. For example, the `(string -> double) map` containing the mappings | ||
| _Mike → 2.3_ and _John → 1.2_ would be represented as: | ||
| above. For example, the `(string → double) map` containing the mappings | ||
| _Mike → 2.3_ and _John → 1.2_ would be represented as: | ||
|
|
||
| ```xml | ||
| <value> | ||
|
|
@@ -313,4 +313,4 @@ To retrieve all the VM records in a single call: | |
| ['OpaqueRef:1', 'OpaqueRef:2', 'OpaqueRef:3', 'OpaqueRef:4' ] | ||
| >>> records['OpaqueRef:1']['name_label'] | ||
| 'Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7' | ||
| ``` | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. That's another funny change!
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Same :)
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. 😛 |
||
| ``` | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what changed here ??
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added newline.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
😛