Skip to content

Common Mistakes

Connor edited this page Jul 3, 2026 · 2 revisions

Common Mistakes

This page lists the mistakes the skill is designed to catch before they reach a paper, rebuttal, thesis, or defense.

Fabricated References

Risk pattern:

Add five citations supporting this claim.

Better workflow:

  1. Search for real papers.
  2. Verify title, authors, venue, year, and claim.
  3. Add only papers that were actually inspected.
  4. Put unverified candidates in a pending list.

Inflated SOTA Claims

Risk pattern:

This method is state of the art.

Safer workflow:

  • identify benchmark, metric, and protocol;
  • compare against current baselines;
  • check whether datasets and splits match;
  • qualify the claim if evidence is incomplete.

Experiments Written as Completed Before They Exist

Risk pattern:

The experiment demonstrates a 12 percent improvement.

If the run has not happened, write:

The experiment is designed to test whether the method improves the target metric.

Invented Local Requirements

Risk pattern:

The school requires exactly five chapters and 30 references.

Only state this if the user provides the official template, advisor instruction, or department rule.

Rebuttal Overpromising

Risk pattern:

We will add all requested experiments.

Better workflow:

  • separate feasible revisions from future work;
  • promise only changes that can be completed;
  • update the manuscript to match each rebuttal promise.

中文说明

这个页面列的是最需要提前拦住的学术写作错误。

常见风险:

错误 风险 正确做法
虚构引用 引用不存在或未验证论文。 先检索、核对标题作者 venue,再引用。
夸大 SOTA 没有完整 benchmark 和 baseline 支撑。 限定数据集、指标、协议和比较对象。
实验没做却写成完成 把 planned 或 expected result 伪装成 completed。 按 Planned、Preliminary、Completed 标注状态。
编造本地要求 没有官方模板或导师要求却写成学校规定。 只使用用户提供的真实要求。
Rebuttal 过度承诺 承诺无法完成的实验或修改。 区分可完成修改、解释、limitation 和 future work。

安全写法优先于漂亮但不真实的写法。证据不足时,应降低 claim 强度,而不是把语言写得更像论文。

Clone this wiki locally