Repository navigation
Research Paper Workflow
Connor edited this page Jul 3, 2026
·
2 revisions
The default workflow is evidence-first: create inspectable matrices and ledgers first, then draft prose.
| Type | Use When | Primary Outputs |
|---|---|---|
research_paper |
Publishable paper, workshop paper, journal paper, related work, experiments, rebuttal, revision | Literature matrix, novelty check, experiment matrix, claim ledger |
undergraduate_thesis |
Undergraduate thesis, graduation project, proposal, midterm report, final report, defense | Requirement log, scope ladder, graduation evidence map |
hybrid_capstone_research |
A capstone or thesis may later become a paper or portfolio project | Thesis MVP, evidence package, research upgrade plan |
For hybrid work, satisfy school or advisor evidence expectations first, then decide whether to upgrade toward research-paper standards.
| Step | Decision | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Select project type | Set research_paper, undergraduate_thesis, or hybrid_capstone_research. |
| 2 | Identify stage | Topic selection, literature review, novelty, experiments, writing, revision, rebuttal, defense, or packaging. |
| 3 | Load minimal modules | Use only task-relevant modules plus core invariants. |
| 4 | Build structured artifacts | Create matrices and ledgers before final prose when evidence tracking matters. |
| 5 | Verify strong claims | Map each claim to literature, experiments, implementation evidence, tests, proofs, or official requirements. |
| 6 | Run integrity checks | Separate plans, preliminary results, and completed results. Do not invent requirements. |
| 7 | Draft or revise | Write final prose or rebuttal only after the evidence record is inspectable. |
| 8 | Human review | Submission, authorship, ethics, school compliance, and defense decisions require human confirmation. |
| Task | Recommended Route |
|---|---|
| Literature review |
00_core_invariants, 01_agent_orchestrator, 06_literature_engine, 11_integrity_reproducibility_guard
|
| Novelty or SOTA check | Add 07_novelty_verification_and_scoring, 11_integrity_reproducibility_guard
|
| Experiment planning | Add 09_experiment_matrix_engine, 11_integrity_reproducibility_guard
|
| Figure/table planning | Add 10_figure_table_engine
|
| Rebuttal or simulated review | Add 13_simulated_review_rebuttal, 11_integrity_reproducibility_guard
|
默认 workflow 是 evidence-first:先产出可检查的矩阵和 ledger,再写最终 prose。
标准流程:
- 判断项目类型:research paper、undergraduate thesis 或 hybrid capstone research。
- 判断阶段:选题、文献综述、novelty、实验、写作、修改、rebuttal、答辩或打包。
- 加载最少必要模块。
- 先建立结构化证据:literature matrix、experiment matrix、claim ledger。
- 每个强 claim 都映射到文献、实验、实现、测试、证明或官方要求。
- 做完整性检查:区分 planned、preliminary 和 completed。
- 证据可检查后再写正文或 rebuttal。
- 最终提交、作者署名、伦理和高风险 claim 需要人类确认。
对于 hybrid 工作,先满足学校或导师要求,再决定是否升级成 research-paper 标准。
- Home / 首页
- Installation / 安装
- Use Cases / 使用场景
- Research Paper Workflow / 论文流程
- Literature Review Workflow / 文献综述
- Rebuttal Template Guide / Rebuttal 模板
- Thesis and Capstone Usage / 本科论文与毕设
- Claim Ledger Example / Claim Ledger 示例
- Evidence and Integrity / 证据与完整性
- Common Mistakes / 常见错误
- Module Routing / 模块路由
- Examples and Templates / 示例与模板
- FAQ / 常见问题