-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 185
ADBC driver for production in-process usage #3395
Copy link
Copy link
Open
Labels
arrowIssues related to arrow upstream.Issues related to arrow upstream.discussDiscussion wantedDiscussion wanted
Description
Opening this issue as a place to collect requirements for any possible future ADBC work.
Possible scenarios where ADBC could be useful:
- Library similar to
iceberg-core+iceberg-arrow, "can my data science team read the Arrow files in XT directly?" (secondarily worth being aware of this sort of extensibility: https://duckdb.org/2024/06/10/delta.html) - Maximum performance for running application code alongside an XT node (i.e. in-process without transport or serde overheads)
Reference implementation https://duckdb.org/docs/api/adbc
XTDB could be quite unique as transactional ADBC database that avoids roundtrip latencies with ~zero coordination/locking for long running reads.
Reactions are currently unavailable
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
arrowIssues related to arrow upstream.Issues related to arrow upstream.discussDiscussion wantedDiscussion wanted
Type
Projects
Status
💭 Backlog