Add file-utils feature into remote() function

[jdespatis]

Push #378 further, in order to also implement file-utils logic into remote() function

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+0.07%) when pulling 51e69e6 on jdespatis:file-utils-for-remote into 248e469 on yeoman:master.

[SBoudrias]

Hi there, thanks for the PR.

Could you add unit test?

[jdespatis]

@SBoudrias I was fearing the question..
The fact is I have no time now for some period, so maybe you can accept this PR and add unit tests afterwards ?
or you can cherry pick this commit and add unit tests to perform a new PR, no problem about that

[addyosmani]

@passy is going to try authoring the tests for this. Initially assigning the issue to him.

[jdespatis]

@addyosmani @passy ok thanks !

For memory, the unit tests added by @SBoudrias for this.src are at: https://github.com/yeoman/generator/pull/378/files

So Inspiration has to be taken there in order to do the same thing for remote.src I guess

[sindresorhus]

@passy ping, since you're assigned to this ;)

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+1.41%) when pulling 82b13cd on jdespatis:file-utils-for-remote into 248e469 on yeoman:master.

[SBoudrias]

I'm not super convinced by the unit tests added.

I think it'd be more relevant to test that the bases path are setup correctly on the env. E.g.:

assert(  remote.src.fromBase('.'), 'remote/path/' );
assert(  remote.src.fromDestBase('.'), generator.destinationRoot() );

(Also, it'd be better to send PR without merge commit included)

[jdespatis]

@SBoudrias I can try a rebase -i if you want

You prefer to fork this PR to add your corrections @SBoudrias ? or you can make your own PR and I close this one, no problem also

[SBoudrias]

I'm taking care of it ATM.

[jdespatis]

ok thanks @SBoudrias !

[passy]

@SBoudrias Thanks!

[SBoudrias]

Merged on master, thanks a lot!

[jdespatis]

cool ;) thanks

[addyosmani]

Great to see this land. Thanks!