content provider: add result callback to content provider #946
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
to learn if the server did successfully complete a client-request or not.
Owner
|
@ottigeda, thanks for the pull request, but unfortunately the code looks problematic... It doesn't guarantee that the callback is really called in all the situations. You have to care for all the methods (not only Anyway, I understand fully what you really wanted to do in #930. I'll ponder over how I can implement it. Thanks for your attempt! |
yhirose
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 2, 2021
yhirose
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 2, 2021
ExclusiveOrange
pushed a commit
to ExclusiveOrange/cpp-httplib-exor
that referenced
this pull request
May 2, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
to learn if the server did successfully complete a client-request or not.
As a follow up to my question in #930, I tried to come up with a solution for it.