-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
doc: revise auth.js guide #401
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughThe pull request updates the documentation for integrating Auth.js with ZenStack, emphasizing its applicability to full-stack projects beyond Next.js. Key modifications include the removal of the data model requirements section, the addition of a preparation section for Next.js setup, and an expanded integration section detailing the use of the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
docs/guides/authentication/next-auth.md (4)
15-21: Consider adding version compatibility information.While the preparation steps are clear, it would be helpful to specify:
- Minimum supported versions of Auth.js and Next.js
- Any known version compatibility constraints
66-66: Fix word order for better readability.Consider rewording:
- You also can use ZenStack's [Next.js server adapter] + You can also use ZenStack's [Next.js server adapter]🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~66-~66: These words/punctuation marks might seem a little out of order. For clarity and coherence, try switching them around.
Context: ...` ### Mounting automatic CRUD API You also can use ZenStack's [Next.js server adapter]...(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_WORD_ORDER)
36-48: Consider adding error handling.The server component should handle cases where authentication fails or returns null. Consider adding error states and loading states for a more robust implementation.
Example enhancement:
export default function Page() { const authObj = await auth(); + if (!authObj) { + return <div>Please sign in to view posts</div>; + } const db = enhance(prisma, { user: authObj?.user }); const posts = await db.post.findMany()
79-87: Consider documenting additional configuration options.While the basic setup is clear, it would be helpful to document:
- Available configuration options for
NextRequestHandler- How to customize error responses
- How to add middleware for logging or additional security
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/guides/authentication/next-auth.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/guides/authentication/next-auth.md
[uncategorized] ~66-~66: These words/punctuation marks might seem a little out of order. For clarity and coherence, try switching them around.
Context: ...` ### Mounting automatic CRUD API You also can use ZenStack's [Next.js server adapter]...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_WORD_ORDER)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
docs/guides/authentication/next-auth.md (1)
9-13: LGTM! Clear and informative introduction.
The introduction effectively communicates the framework-agnostic nature of Auth.js while providing a concrete Next.js example. The sample project reference is helpful for readers.
| export async function GET(request: Request) { | ||
| const authObj = await auth(); | ||
| const db = enhance(prisma, { user: authObj?.user }); | ||
| return db.post.findMany() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add proper HTTP response handling.
The route handler should properly format the response and handle potential errors.
Example enhancement:
export async function GET(request: Request) {
const authObj = await auth();
+ if (!authObj) {
+ return new Response('Unauthorized', { status: 401 });
+ }
const db = enhance(prisma, { user: authObj?.user });
- return db.post.findMany()
+ try {
+ const posts = await db.post.findMany();
+ return new Response(JSON.stringify(posts), {
+ status: 200,
+ headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' },
+ });
+ } catch (error) {
+ return new Response('Internal Server Error', { status: 500 });
+ }
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export async function GET(request: Request) { | |
| const authObj = await auth(); | |
| const db = enhance(prisma, { user: authObj?.user }); | |
| return db.post.findMany() | |
| export async function GET(request: Request) { | |
| const authObj = await auth(); | |
| if (!authObj) { | |
| return new Response('Unauthorized', { status: 401 }); | |
| } | |
| const db = enhance(prisma, { user: authObj?.user }); | |
| try { | |
| const posts = await db.post.findMany(); | |
| return new Response(JSON.stringify(posts), { | |
| status: 200, | |
| headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' }, | |
| }); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| return new Response('Internal Server Error', { status: 500 }); | |
| } | |
| } |
Summary by CodeRabbit
PrismaClient.