-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
First pass at auth0 integration docs #403
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@Driptap has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 18 minutes and 47 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces substantial revisions to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
docs/guides/authentication/auth0.md (5)
10-10: Fix grammatical and clarity issues in the introductionThe introduction has some minor issues that could be improved:
- "have and understanding" should be "have an understanding"
- Consider simplifying wordy phrases for better readability
Here's a suggested revision:
-This guide aims to give some simple examples of using Auth0 to provide authentication when used in conjunction with Zenstack. It will not take into account the different types of authentication that Auth0 offers. The premise is that you have and understanding of Auth0's method of authentication and are able to produce an object as a result of authenticating a user with Auth0. +This guide provides examples of using Auth0 authentication with Zenstack. It assumes you understand Auth0's authentication methods and can generate a user object after Auth0 authentication.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~10-~10: ‘in conjunction with’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...th0 to provide authentication when used in conjunction with Zenstack. It will not take into account...(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_IN_CONJUNCTION_WITH)
[style] ~10-~10: ‘take into account’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ... conjunction with Zenstack. It will not take into account the different types of authentication t...(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_TAKE_INTO_ACCOUNT)
[style] ~10-~10: As a shorter alternative for ‘able to’, consider using “can”.
Context: ...of Auth0's method of authentication and are able to produce an object as a result of authen...(BE_ABLE_TO)
18-23: Add TypeScript type definitions for better type safetyThe code examples would benefit from TypeScript type definitions to ensure type safety.
Here's a suggested improvement:
interface Auth0User { id: string; specialKey: string; } export const getPrisma = async (req: Request): Promise<PrismaClient> => { const user: Auth0User = await getAuthenticatedAuth0User(req); return enhance(user); };Also applies to: 27-34
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
18-18: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
18-131: Add language specifiers to code blocks and fix typo
- All code blocks should specify their language for proper syntax highlighting
- There's a typo in line 114: "tyoe" should be "type"
Add appropriate language specifiers to the code blocks:
- For TypeScript/JavaScript code blocks: ```typescript
- For schema/model definitions: ```prisma
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~114-~114: This verb does not appear to agree with the subject. Consider using a different form.
Context: ...n. In this case, the Auth tyoe is what provide authentication, not the User model, for...(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_VERB_AGREEMENT)
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
18-18: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
27-27: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
42-42: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
68-68: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
74-74: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
87-87: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
116-116: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
91-93: Improve error message clarityThe error message for unauthenticated users could be more descriptive.
- throw new Error('UNAUTHENTICATED'); // Throw an error if the user isn's authenticated + throw new Error('User authentication required: No valid session found');
43-63: Add security considerations for JWT handlingConsider adding the following security best practices:
- Token expiration validation
- Rate limiting for authentication attempts
- Secure error messages that don't leak implementation details
Would you like me to provide example code for implementing these security measures?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/guides/authentication/auth0.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/guides/authentication/auth0.md
[style] ~10-~10: ‘in conjunction with’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...th0 to provide authentication when used in conjunction with Zenstack. It will not take into account...
(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_IN_CONJUNCTION_WITH)
[style] ~10-~10: ‘take into account’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ... conjunction with Zenstack. It will not take into account the different types of authentication t...
(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_TAKE_INTO_ACCOUNT)
[style] ~10-~10: As a shorter alternative for ‘able to’, consider using “can”.
Context: ...of Auth0's method of authentication and are able to produce an object as a result of authen...
(BE_ABLE_TO)
[uncategorized] ~114-~114: This verb does not appear to agree with the subject. Consider using a different form.
Context: ...n. In this case, the Auth tyoe is what provide authentication, not the User model, for...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_VERB_AGREEMENT)
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
docs/guides/authentication/auth0.md
18-18: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
27-27: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
42-42: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
68-68: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
74-74: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
87-87: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
116-116: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
ymc9
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @Driptap , many thanks for working on this guide! Auth0 integration has been in the backlog for quite a while and finally we'll have it!
I've added a couple of comments. Please help check them. Thanks!
Address PR comments
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
docs/guides/authentication/auth0.md (2)
10-10: Fix grammatical errors in the introductionThere's a typo in the introduction: "have and understanding" should be "have an understanding". Also, consider making it more concise:
-This guide aims to give some simple examples of using Auth0 to provide authentication when used in conjunction with ZenStack. It will not take into account the different types of authentication that Auth0 offers. The premise is that you have and understanding of Auth0's method of authentication and are able to produce an object as a result of authenticating a user with Auth0. +This guide provides examples of using Auth0 authentication with ZenStack. It assumes you have an understanding of Auth0's authentication methods and can produce an authentication object from Auth0.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~10-~10: ‘in conjunction with’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...th0 to provide authentication when used in conjunction with ZenStack. It will not take into account...(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_IN_CONJUNCTION_WITH)
[style] ~10-~10: ‘take into account’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ... conjunction with ZenStack. It will not take into account the different types of authentication t...(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_TAKE_INTO_ACCOUNT)
[style] ~10-~10: As a shorter alternative for ‘able to’, consider using “can”.
Context: ...of Auth0's method of authentication and are able to produce an object as a result of authen...(BE_ABLE_TO)
116-130: Add documentation comments to schema modelsConsider adding documentation comments to explain the relationship between Auth and User models:
+/// Represents the authenticated session from Auth0 type Auth { id String @id @@auth // And decorate it } +/// Represents the user profile in the database +/// @note This model is separate from Auth and stores additional user information model User { id String @id name String? email String? @@allow('create, read, update, delete', auth().id == this.id) }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/guides/authentication/auth0.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/guides/authentication/auth0.md
[style] ~10-~10: ‘in conjunction with’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...th0 to provide authentication when used in conjunction with ZenStack. It will not take into account...
(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_IN_CONJUNCTION_WITH)
[style] ~10-~10: ‘take into account’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ... conjunction with ZenStack. It will not take into account the different types of authentication t...
(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_TAKE_INTO_ACCOUNT)
[style] ~10-~10: As a shorter alternative for ‘able to’, consider using “can”.
Context: ...of Auth0's method of authentication and are able to produce an object as a result of authen...
(BE_ABLE_TO)
[uncategorized] ~77-~77: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ... to this variable and set the types for it as referred to in the *Enhancing the pr...
(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
[uncategorized] ~113-~113: This verb does not appear to agree with the subject. Consider using a different form.
Context: ...n. In this case, the Auth type is what provide authentication, not the User model, for...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_VERB_AGREEMENT)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
docs/guides/authentication/auth0.md (1)
42-62:
Add imports and improve JWT verification
The JWT verification code needs additional improvements:
- Add required imports:
import * as jose from 'jose';
import { enhance } from '@zenstackhq/runtime';- The previous review comment about improving error handling and security in JWT verification is still valid. Please refer to that comment for the detailed implementation suggestions.
Added more detail to the section on working alongside a User model
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
docs/guides/authentication/auth0.md (3)
10-10: Improve clarity and fix grammatical issues in the introductionThe introduction paragraph has some grammatical issues and could be clearer. Consider this revision:
-This guide aims to give some simple examples of using Auth0 to provide authentication when used in conjunction with ZenStack. It will not take into account the different types of authentication that Auth0 offers. The premise is that you have and understanding of Auth0's method of authentication and are able to produce an object as a result of authenticating a user with Auth0. +This guide provides simple examples of using Auth0 authentication with ZenStack. While Auth0 offers various authentication methods, this guide assumes you understand Auth0's authentication basics and can obtain a user object after authentication.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~10-~10: ‘in conjunction with’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...th0 to provide authentication when used in conjunction with ZenStack. It will not take into account...(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_IN_CONJUNCTION_WITH)
[style] ~10-~10: ‘take into account’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ... conjunction with ZenStack. It will not take into account the different types of authentication t...(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_TAKE_INTO_ACCOUNT)
[style] ~10-~10: As a shorter alternative for ‘able to’, consider using “can”.
Context: ...of Auth0's method of authentication and are able to produce an object as a result of authen...(BE_ABLE_TO)
129-147: Add form validation and error handling to the Profile componentThe Profile component needs several improvements for better user experience and error handling:
- Form validation
- Error handling for the mutation
- Loading state handling
const Profile = () => { const { user, isAuthenticated, isLoading } = useAuth0(); const { trigger, isMutating } = useCreateUser(); + const [error, setError] = useState<string | null>(null); const createUser = useCallback(async (event: FormEvent<HTMLFormElement>) => { + event.preventDefault(); const formData = new FormData(event.currentTarget); const name = formData.get('name'); + if (!name) { + setError('Name is required'); + return; + } + try { await trigger({ data: { id: user.sub, name: name, }, }); + } catch (err) { + setError('Failed to create user'); + console.error(err); + } }, [trigger, user]) - return <UserForm onSubmit={createUser}/> + if (isLoading || isMutating) { + return <div>Loading...</div>; + } + + return ( + <> + {error && <div className="error">{error}</div>} + <UserForm onSubmit={createUser} /> + </> + ); };
154-169: Add documentation comments to the Prisma schemaConsider adding documentation comments to explain the relationship between Auth type and User model, and the purpose of each field.
// Specify the auth type type Auth { + /// Unique identifier matching the Auth0 user ID id String @id @@auth // And decorate it } // add your user model as a regular model model User { + /// Matches the Auth0 user ID id String @id + /// User's display name name String? + /// User's email address email String? + /// Only allow users to manage their own data @@allow('create, read, update, delete', auth().id == this.id) }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/guides/authentication/auth0.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/guides/authentication/auth0.md
[style] ~10-~10: ‘in conjunction with’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...th0 to provide authentication when used in conjunction with ZenStack. It will not take into account...
(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_IN_CONJUNCTION_WITH)
[style] ~10-~10: ‘take into account’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ... conjunction with ZenStack. It will not take into account the different types of authentication t...
(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_TAKE_INTO_ACCOUNT)
[style] ~10-~10: As a shorter alternative for ‘able to’, consider using “can”.
Context: ...of Auth0's method of authentication and are able to produce an object as a result of authen...
(BE_ABLE_TO)
[style] ~110-~110: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...r(req); return enhance(user); }; ``` You can use the result of this token to red...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
[uncategorized] ~152-~152: This verb does not appear to agree with the subject. Consider using a different form.
Context: ...n. In this case, the Auth type is what provide authentication, not the User model, for...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_VERB_AGREEMENT)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
docs/guides/authentication/auth0.md (3)
19-22: Add error handling and improve implementation details
The function needs proper error handling and is missing important implementation details.
42-62: Improve error handling and security in JWT verification
The JWT verification code needs improvements in error handling, token extraction, and type safety.
87-102: Improve type safety and null checks in currentUser function
The function needs improved type safety and proper null checks.
|
Thanks for your review @ymc9 - i think i've addressed all your comments. It's a little tricky gauging how much detail to go into in the section "Working along side a user model". I've added some more details & examples to it to try to make it clearer. |
Wording improvement
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
docs/guides/authentication/auth0.md (1)
7-7: Maintain consistent product name casingChange "Integrating With Auth0" to "Integrating with Auth0" to follow sentence case convention.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/guides/authentication/auth0.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/guides/authentication/auth0.md
[uncategorized] ~76-~76: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ... to this variable and set the types for it as referred to in the *Enhancing the pr...
(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
[style] ~109-~109: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...r(req); return enhance(user); }; ``` You can use the result of this token to red...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
docs/guides/authentication/auth0.md (4)
18-21: Add error handling and type safety
The getPrisma function needs proper error handling and type definitions.
86-101: Add type safety to currentUser function
113-120: Add error handling to route handler
99-99:
Replace non-standard isNull function
The code uses isNull() which isn't a standard JavaScript function.
- dbUserExists: !isNull(dbUser), // If the user doesn't exist in the database, this variable can be set in the session
+ dbUserExists: dbUser !== null, // If the user doesn't exist in the database, this variable can be set in the sessionLikely invalid or redundant comment.
A few more comments
Improved gramma
Awesome, thank you! I've made some final touchup. Merging it now! |
I have a working Auth0 integration and wanted to share it, this is a first pass and explaining it in documentation I would have found useful when setting it up.
Summary by CodeRabbit