Update auth0.md #407
Update auth0.md #407
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several modifications to the documentation for integrating Auth0 authentication with ZenStack. Key changes include clarifications on creating user objects, enhancing error handling for JWT verification, and refining onboarding flow explanations. A new example for authenticating users with JWT has been added, and the client-side code has been improved to utilize an API fetch request for user creation. Additionally, new methods have been added and existing ones modified to better encapsulate user management logic. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
docs/guides/authentication/auth0.md (2)
Line range hint
85-120: Improve type safety and error handling in currentUser function.The implementation could benefit from:
- More descriptive error messages
- Type safety improvements
- Proper null checks
Consider this enhanced implementation:
-const currentUser = async (req) => { +interface CurrentUser { + id: string; + dbUserExists: boolean; +} + +const currentUser = async (req): Promise<CurrentUser> => { // Get your auth0 auth session const session = await getSession(req); if (!session?.user.sub) { - throw new Error('UNAUTHENTICATED'); + throw new Error('User not authenticated. Please log in to continue.'); } // Find the user in the db const dbUser = await prisma.user.findUnique({ where: { id: session.user.sub }, }); return { id: session.user.sub, - dbUserExists: !isNull(dbUser), + dbUserExists: dbUser !== null, }; };
Line range hint
37-57: Enhance JWT verification security measures.The JWT verification implementation could be strengthened with:
- Proper error handling
- Safe header parsing
- Timeout for JWKS fetch
Consider these security improvements:
export const getPrismaJWT = async (req) => { try { - const jwks = jose.createRemoteJWKSet(new URL(process.env.AUTH0_JWKS_URI)); + const jwks = jose.createRemoteJWKSet( + new URL(process.env.AUTH0_JWKS_URI), + { timeoutDuration: 5000 } + ); - const token = toString(req.headers.get('authorization')).replace('Bearer ', ''); + const authHeader = req.headers.get('authorization'); + if (!authHeader?.startsWith('Bearer ')) { + throw new Error('Invalid authorization header'); + } + const token = authHeader.slice(7); const res = await jose.jwtVerify(token, jwks, { issuer: `${process.env.AUTH0_ISSUER_BASE_URL}/`, audience: process.env.AUTH0_AUDIENCE, algorithms: ['RS256'], }); const userId = res.payload.sub; const user = { id: userId, specialKey: res.payload.metadata.specialKey }; return enhance(prisma, {user}); - catch (err) { - // unauthenticated error + } catch (err) { + console.error('JWT verification failed:', err); + throw new Error('Authentication failed. Please log in again.'); } };
| try { | ||
| // create a new user | ||
| await fetch('/api/create-user', { | ||
| method: 'POST', | ||
| body: JSON.stringify({ | ||
| id: user.sub, | ||
| name: name, | ||
| }), | ||
| }); | ||
| } catch(error){...} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance error handling and request configuration.
The current implementation has several areas for improvement:
- Add proper error handling instead of the placeholder
- Include Content-Type header for JSON requests
- Handle API response status codes
Consider this improved implementation:
try {
// create a new user
await fetch('/api/create-user', {
method: 'POST',
+ headers: {
+ 'Content-Type': 'application/json'
+ },
body: JSON.stringify({
id: user.sub,
name: name,
}),
});
+ const response = await res.json();
+ if (!response.ok) {
+ throw new Error(`Failed to create user: ${response.statusText}`);
+ }
- } catch(error){...}
+ } catch(error) {
+ console.error('Failed to create user:', error);
+ throw new Error('Failed to create user. Please try again.');
+ }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
Summary by CodeRabbit
currentUserfunction for user existence checks and session management.