Skip to content

Conversation

@ymc9
Copy link
Member

@ymc9 ymc9 commented Nov 28, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added FAQ entry clarifying supported JavaScript runtimes and future compatibility options
    • Updated roadmap to include databases as a planned feature domain

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 28, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
zenstack-new-site Ready Ready Preview Comment Nov 28, 2025 8:03pm

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 28, 2025

Walkthrough

Two documentation files in the versioned docs folder were updated. The FAQ received a new subsection addressing JavaScript runtime support, specifying Node.js as tested. The roadmap was extended with a new top-level "Databases" category and MySQL sub-item.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation Updates
versioned_docs/version-3.x/faq.md, versioned_docs/version-3.x/roadmap.md
FAQ: Added subsection "What JavaScript runtimes are supported?" documenting Node.js support and inviting feedback on Bun/Deno. Roadmap: Added "Databases" top-level item with unchecked "MySQL" sub-item.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'doc: misc updates' is vague and generic, using non-descriptive terms that don't convey meaningful information about the specific changes made. Replace with a more specific title that describes the actual changes, such as 'doc: add JavaScript runtime FAQ and MySQL roadmap item' to better reflect the substantive additions.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch docs/misc-6

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fa7038e and 24412e4.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • versioned_docs/version-3.x/faq.md (1 hunks)
  • versioned_docs/version-3.x/roadmap.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
versioned_docs/version-3.x/roadmap.md

15-15: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4

(MD007, ul-indent)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
versioned_docs/version-3.x/faq.md (1)

15-17: LGTM!

The new subsection on JavaScript runtime support is well-written, clearly communicates the current scope (Node.js tested), and invites community feedback. The tone and formatting align with existing FAQ sections.

@ymc9 ymc9 merged commit 40e50ca into main Nov 28, 2025
4 checks passed
@ymc9 ymc9 deleted the docs/misc-6 branch November 28, 2025 21:30
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Dec 2, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants