Skip to content

Conversation

@ymc9
Copy link
Member

@ymc9 ymc9 commented Nov 29, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added FAQ section with troubleshooting steps for "Error: non exhaustive match" when running the generate command, including package configuration override instructions and dependency reinstallation guidance.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 29, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
zenstack-new-site Ready Ready Preview Comment Nov 29, 2025 11:32pm

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 29, 2025

Walkthrough

Added an FAQ section to the Better Auth integration documentation providing a workaround for the "Error: non exhaustive match" encountered when running zen generate. The FAQ includes package.json overrides for chevrotain and instructions for reinstalling dependencies, inserted in two locations within the document.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation: Better Auth FAQ
versioned_docs/version-3.x/recipe/auth-integration/better-auth.md
Added FAQ section with troubleshooting steps for "Error: non exhaustive match" error, including chevrotain dependency override example and node_modules reinstall instructions; placed in two locations within the document.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'chore: add FAQ to better-auth docs' accurately and concisely describes the main change: adding FAQ content to the better-auth documentation file.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch chore/better-auth-faq

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c7ef05c and 09576a2.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • versioned_docs/version-3.x/recipe/auth-integration/better-auth.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
versioned_docs/version-3.x/recipe/auth-integration/better-auth.md

[grammar] ~156-~156: Use a hyphen to join words.
Context: ...AQ - Why do I get the error "Error: non exhaustive match" when running "zen gene...

(QB_NEW_EN_HYPHEN)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
versioned_docs/version-3.x/recipe/auth-integration/better-auth.md (1)

154-169: Well-structured FAQ with clear workaround.

The FAQ section is well-organized, provides helpful context about the dependency conflict, and gives clear remediation steps. Placement after the integration examples and before the sample project is logical and improves documentation discoverability.

@ymc9 ymc9 merged commit 245801a into main Nov 30, 2025
4 checks passed
@ymc9 ymc9 deleted the chore/better-auth-faq branch November 30, 2025 00:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants