add opposite relation 'posts'

[lsmith77]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated modeling documentation with examples of defining one-to-many relationships between models.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[vercel]

@lsmith77 is attempting to deploy a commit to the ZenStack Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Updated the User model in the documentation by adding a posts relation field that establishes a one-to-many association to the Post model in a ZModel code example.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Change Summary
Documentation Model Update versioned_docs/version-3.x/modeling/index.md	Added relation field posts: Post[] to User model in ZModel snippet, establishing one-to-many association

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title 'add opposite relation 'posts'' directly and specifically describes the main change: adding a new relation field 'posts' to the User model as documented in the PR summary.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f5eecd9 and 8ff1c9c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• versioned_docs/version-3.x/modeling/index.md (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

versioned_docs/version-3.x/modeling/index.md (1)

32-32: Good addition to complete the relation.

Adding the posts Post[] field properly documents the bidirectional relationship between User and Post models. The field naming and type are idiomatic—plural for a one-to-many association—and the example now demonstrates the complete relationship pattern that readers should follow.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[ymc9]

Thank you!