State of ZetaChain Functionality table #516
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces enhancements to the documentation related to ZetaChain. A new section titled "functionality" has been added to the JSON metadata, providing a title and description for clarity. Additionally, a detailed functionality table has been introduced in the Markdown documentation, outlining various capabilities across different environments and chain types. A terminology section has also been added to define key terms, ensuring that users have a clear understanding of the functionalities available within the ZetaChain ecosystem. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/pages/developers/chains/functionality.mdx (2)
20-21: Standardize date format for future releasesThe table uses inconsistent date formats:
- "Dec 2024" format in most places
- "Feb 25" format for Solana features
Please standardize to use the full format (e.g., "Feb 2025") for clarity.
-| Withdraw and call (fungible token) | Solana | ❌ | Feb 25 | ❌ | ❌ | -| Withdraw and call (native coin) | Solana | ❌ | Feb 25 | ❌ | ❌ | +| Withdraw and call (fungible token) | Solana | ❌ | Feb 2025 | ❌ | ❌ | +| Withdraw and call (native coin) | Solana | ❌ | Feb 2025 | ❌ | ❌ |
1-37: Consider adding a note about feature release timelineThe table includes several features planned for future releases (Dec 2024, Feb 2025). Consider adding a note at the beginning or end of the table to:
- Explain that some features are planned for future releases
- Clarify that dates are tentative/subject to change
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/pages/developers/chains/_meta.json(1 hunks)src/pages/developers/chains/functionality.mdx(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/pages/developers/chains/_meta.json
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/pages/developers/chains/functionality.mdx (2)
1-2: LGTM: Well-structured table format
The table structure follows Markdown best practices with clear column headers and consistent alignment.
41-67: LGTM: Clear and comprehensive terminology definitions
The terminology section effectively defines each feature type with:
- Clear explanations
- Relevant examples
- Consistent formatting
GMaiolo
left a comment
GMaiolo
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good
Only comment is what coderabbit picked up about a duplicated entry
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/pages/developers/chains/functionality.mdx (2)
7-8: Standardize date format for consistencyThe timeline entries use inconsistent date formats:
- "Dec 2024" (lines 7-8)
- "Feb 25" (lines 20-21)
Please standardize to the more explicit format "Feb 2025" for clarity.
Apply this change:
-| Withdraw and call (fungible token) | Solana | ❌ | Feb 25 | ❌ | ❌ | -| Withdraw and call (native coin) | Solana | ❌ | Feb 25 | ❌ | ❌ | +| Withdraw and call (fungible token) | Solana | ❌ | Feb 2025 | ❌ | ❌ | +| Withdraw and call (native coin) | Solana | ❌ | Feb 2025 | ❌ | ❌ |Also applies to: 16-21
64-66: Consider enhancing the "Call" definition with chain-specific detailsThe "Call" functionality shows varying support across different chains (supported in EVM but not in Solana/TON). Consider expanding the definition to explain any chain-specific limitations or requirements.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/pages/developers/chains/functionality.mdx(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/pages/developers/chains/functionality.mdx (2)
1-2: LGTM: Well-structured table format
The table structure follows proper markdown formatting with consistent column alignment and clear headers.
38-66: LGTM: Clear and comprehensive terminology definitions
The terminology section effectively defines all features mentioned in the table, with helpful examples for each concept.
Summary by CodeRabbit
These enhancements improve clarity and provide a better understanding of ZetaChain's operational capabilities for developers and users.