Skip to content

YourNote 603: Java Application Server

Zhamri Che Ani edited this page Jun 6, 2026 · 1 revision

Java Application Server Comparison

Feature Tomcat TomEE WildFly GlassFish JBoss EAP Payara Server
Type Servlet Container Jakarta EE Server Jakarta EE Server Jakarta EE Reference Server Enterprise Jakarta EE Server Enterprise Jakarta EE Server
Maintainer Apache Software Foundation Apache Software Foundation WildFly Project Eclipse Foundation Red Hat Payara Services
Servlet/JSP
EJB
CDI
JPA
JMS
JTA Transactions
MicroProfile Partial Limited Partial
Embedded Server N/A Limited Yes Limited No Yes
Production Use Very High Moderate High Low Very High High
Learning Difficulty Easy Easy-Medium Medium Medium Medium-High Medium
Memory Usage Very Low Low Medium Medium High Medium
License Cost Free Free Free Free Commercial Support Community & Commercial

1. Apache Tomcat

Tomcat is a Servlet Container.

Supports:

  • Servlet
  • JSP
  • WebSocket
  • HTTP

Does NOT support:

  • EJB
  • JMS
  • JTA
  • Full Jakarta EE

Advantages

  • Fast startup
  • Lightweight
  • Easy deployment
  • Industry standard for Spring Boot

Disadvantages

  • No EJB support
  • No enterprise messaging
  • No distributed transaction support

Best for

  • Spring Boot
  • REST APIs
  • Lightweight web applications

Typical Use

Spring Boot
      +
Embedded Tomcat

This is the most common Java architecture today.

2. Apache TomEE

TomEE =

Tomcat
+
EJB
+
JPA
+
CDI
+
JTA

Advantages

  • Easy migration from Tomcat
  • Supports EJB
  • Lightweight compared to WildFly

Disadvantages

  • Smaller community
  • Less common in industry

Best for

  • Learning EJB
  • Small Jakarta EE projects

3. WildFly

Successor to the original JBoss Application Server.

Advantages

  • Full Jakarta EE
  • MicroProfile support
  • Strong clustering
  • Active community

Disadvantages

  • More complex than Tomcat
  • Higher memory usage

Best for

  • Enterprise applications
  • Microservices
  • Distributed systems

Common Technologies

  • EJB
  • JMS
  • JPA
  • CDI
  • JAX-RS

4. GlassFish

Reference implementation of Jakarta EE. When Jakarta EE introduces a new specification, GlassFish usually implements it first.

Advantages

  • Standards compliant
  • Excellent for learning Jakarta EE

Disadvantages

  • Less common in production
  • Smaller community

Best for

  • Universities
  • Learning EJB
  • Jakarta EE research

5. JBoss EAP

Commercial version of WildFly from Red Hat.

Advantages

  • Enterprise support
  • Long-term support (LTS)
  • Certified platform

Disadvantages

  • License/subscription cost
  • More administration effort

Best for

  • Banks
  • Government agencies
  • Insurance companies

Typical Users

  • Large corporations
  • Mission-critical systems

6. Payara Server

A fork of GlassFish focused on production environments.

Advantages

  • Full Jakarta EE
  • Active support
  • Better production readiness than GlassFish
  • Good MicroProfile support

Disadvantages

  • Smaller ecosystem than WildFly

Best for

  • Modern Jakarta EE applications
  • Cloud-native enterprise systems

Comparison by Usage

Scenario Recommended Server
Learning Servlet/JSP Tomcat
Spring Boot Development Tomcat
Learning EJB TomEE
Learning Jakarta EE GlassFish
Enterprise Development WildFly
Banking Systems JBoss EAP
Government Systems JBoss EAP
Production Jakarta EE Payara
Cloud-Native Jakarta EE Payara
Microservices WildFly / Spring Boot

Modern Industry Recommendation

Today most new Java applications use:

Spring Boot
      +
Embedded Tomcat

instead of:

EJB
      +
Application Server

because Spring Boot is:

  • Easier to learn
  • Easier to deploy
  • Better for microservices
  • Better suited for cloud environments
  • Requires less server administration

Clone this wiki locally