[Label Audit] Weekly Report — 2026-03-16 #315
Description
Scanned: 22 repositories | Run: 23149280388
⚠️ Phase 2 (Synchronize Labels) was not executed. The available safe-output tooling (add_labels) only applies labels to existing issues/PRs and cannot create or update repository labels. All counts below reflect audit findings only; no labels were created or modified this run. Usenpx github-label-sync --labels labels.ymlor thesync-labelsworkflow to apply the taxonomy.
Summary
| Metric | Count |
|---|---|
| Repos scanned | 22 |
| Taxonomy labels defined | 29 |
| Labels created (missing) | 0 (tool limitation — see note above) |
| Labels updated (inconsistent) | 0 (tool limitation) |
| Extra labels found (not in taxonomy) | 626 |
| Repos at 100% consistency | 0 |
Root cause of 0% consistency across all repos: Every managed repository uses a legacy
/-separated label naming convention (e.g.,priority/critical,type/bug,status/triage) whereas the canonical taxonomy uses:-separated names (e.g.,priority: critical,type: bug,status: needs-triage). These are treated as entirely different labels. A one-time migration is needed to align all repos to the taxonomy naming scheme.
Consistency Scores
| Repository | Score | Missing | Inconsistent | Extra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
zircote/.github |
0% | 29 | 0 | 21 |
zircote/github-project-manager |
0% | 29 | 0 | 15 |
zircote/sdlc-quality |
0% | 28 | 1 | 18 |
zircote/homebrew-tap |
0% | 29 | 0 | 15 |
zircote/atlatl |
0% | 29 | 0 | 21 |
zircote/atlatl-spec |
0% | 29 | 0 | 32 |
zircote/rlm-rs |
0% | 29 | 0 | 20 |
zircote/MIF |
0% | 29 | 0 | 16 |
zircote/subcog |
0% | 29 | 0 | 15 |
zircote/lro-bench |
0% | 29 | 0 | 16 |
zircote/daedalus |
0% | 29 | 0 | 15 |
zircote/ccpkg |
0% | 24 | 5 | 47 |
zircote/refactor |
0% | 29 | 0 | 15 |
zircote/human-voice |
0% | 29 | 0 | 15 |
zircote/rlm-rs-plugin |
0% | 29 | 0 | 15 |
zircote/memory-capture-plugin |
0% | 29 | 0 | 15 |
zircote/documentation-review |
0% | 29 | 0 | 17 |
zircote/adr |
0% | 29 | 0 | 17 |
zircote/adrscope |
0% | 29 | 0 | 16 |
zircote/git-adr |
0% | 29 | 0 | 15 |
zircote/structured-madr |
0% | 29 | 0 | 14 |
zircote/vscode-git-adr |
0% | 29 | 0 | 15 |
Labels Created
No labels were created this run due to tooling limitations (see note above). All 22 repositories are missing all 29 taxonomy labels. The same 29 labels need to be created in every repository:
All repositories — 29 labels required (all repos missing same set)
| Label | Color | Description |
|---|---|---|
priority: critical |
#FF0000 | Immediate attention required - production impact or security issue |
priority: high |
#FF6B6B | Should be addressed in current sprint or iteration |
priority: medium |
#FFE66D | Important but can be scheduled for upcoming work |
priority: low |
#4ECDC4 | Nice to have - address when time permits |
type: bug |
#D73A49 | Something is not working as expected |
type: feature |
#0075CA | New functionality or capability |
type: enhancement |
#A2EEEF | Improvement to existing functionality |
type: documentation |
#0075CA | Documentation updates or additions |
type: security |
#B60205 | Security vulnerability or hardening |
type: maintenance |
#FBCA04 | Chores, refactoring, tech debt, or dependency updates |
type: performance |
#5319E7 | Performance improvements or optimizations |
status: needs-triage |
#EDEDED | Awaiting initial review and prioritization |
status: in-progress |
#0E8A16 | Actively being worked on |
status: blocked |
#B60205 | Cannot proceed - waiting on external dependency or decision |
status: ready-for-review |
#6F42C1 | Work complete, awaiting code review |
status: approved |
#0E8A16 | Approved and ready to merge or deploy |
area: ci-cd |
#1D76DB | CI/CD pipelines, GitHub Actions, or deployment automation |
area: dependencies |
#0366D6 | Dependency updates, version bumps, or package management |
area: testing |
#BFDADC | Test suite, coverage, or testing infrastructure |
area: infrastructure |
#C5DEF5 | Infrastructure, cloud resources, or platform configuration |
effort: small |
#C2E0C6 | Quick fix or minor change (< 2 hours) |
effort: medium |
#FEF2C0 | Moderate work (2-8 hours or 1-2 days) |
effort: large |
#F9D0C4 | Significant effort (> 2 days or requires breakdown) |
report |
#5319E7 | Automated report generated by a gh-aw workflow |
automated |
#BFD4F2 | Created or managed by an automated workflow |
org-monitor |
#0E8A16 | Organization-wide monitoring report from org-monitor workflow |
stale-health |
#FF6B35 | Stale project health report |
dep-ecosystem |
#0366D6 | Dependency ecosystem analysis |
agent-health |
#5319E7 | Agent health monitoring |
To apply: npx github-label-sync --access-token $GITHUB_TOKEN --labels labels.yml zircote/REPO
Labels Updated
No labels were updated this run. The following inconsistencies were found and require manual correction:
zircote/ccpkg — 5 inconsistent labels
| Label | Field | Was | Now |
|---|---|---|---|
priority: critical |
color | #B60205 | #FF0000 |
priority: critical |
description | Must be resolved immediately | Immediate attention required - production impact or security issue |
priority: high |
color | #D93F0B | #FF6B6B |
priority: high |
description | Should be resolved soon | Should be addressed in current sprint or iteration |
priority: medium |
color | #FBCA04 | #FFE66D |
priority: medium |
description | Normal priority | Important but can be scheduled for upcoming work |
priority: low |
color | #0E8A16 | #4ECDC4 |
priority: low |
description | Nice to have | Nice to have - address when time permits |
status: blocked |
description | Blocked by dependency or decision | Cannot proceed - waiting on external dependency or decision |
zircote/sdlc-quality — 1 inconsistent label
| Label | Field | Was | Now |
|---|---|---|---|
automated |
color | #EDEDED | #BFD4F2 |
automated |
description | (empty) | Created or managed by an automated workflow |
Extra Labels (Manual Review)
zircote/.github — 21 extra labels
| Label | Color | Description |
|---|---|---|
bug |
#d73a4a | Something isn't working |
documentation |
#0075ca | Improvements or additions to documentation |
duplicate |
#cfd3d7 | This issue or pull request already exists |
enhancement |
#a2eeef | New feature or request |
good first issue |
#7057ff | Good for newcomers |
help wanted |
#008672 | Extra attention is needed |
invalid |
#e4e669 | This doesn't seem right |
question |
#d876e3 | Further information is requested |
wontfix |
#ffffff | This will not be worked on |
agentic-workflows |
#ededed | (empty) |
type/bug |
#d73a4a | Something isn't working |
type/enhancement |
#a2eeef | Improvement to existing feature |
type/feature |
#0075ca | New feature or request |
type/chore |
#e4e669 | Maintenance and housekeeping |
type/docs |
#0075ca | Documentation updates |
type/refactor |
#d4c5f9 | Code refactoring |
priority/critical |
#b60205 | Must be fixed immediately |
priority/high |
#d93f0b | High priority |
priority/low |
#0e8a16 | Low priority |
priority/medium |
#fbca04 | Medium priority |
status/triage |
#c5def5 | Needs triage |
status/blocked |
#b60205 | Blocked by dependency |
status/in-progress |
#0075ca | Work in progress |
status/needs-review |
#fbca04 | Awaiting review |
status/wontfix |
#ffffff | Will not be addressed |
gpm/report |
#0075ca | GPM automated report |
gpm/alert |
#d73a4a | GPM automated alert |
gpm/knowledge |
#7057ff | GPM knowledge base entry |
automation |
#ededed | (empty) |
gpm/security |
#ededed | (empty) |
zircote/atlatl-spec — 32 extra labels (highest count)
| Label | Color | Description |
|---|---|---|
spec-gap |
#D93F0B | Specification gap or inconsistency |
conformance |
#1D76DB | Conformance level requirement |
cross-section |
#0E8A16 | Cross-section consistency issue |
priority:high |
#B60205 | High severity |
priority:low |
#0E8A16 | Low severity |
priority:medium |
#FBCA04 | Medium severity |
config |
#C5DEF5 | Configuration key or TOML schema issue |
events |
#5319E7 | Event system |
schema |
#006B75 | JSON Schema or type definition issue |
audit:run8 |
#BFD4F2 | Found during Run 8 comprehensive spec audit |
llm-intelligence |
#D4C5F9 | LLM intelligence subsystem |
tooling |
#5319E7 | Build/CI tooling improvement |
spec-inconsistency |
#D93F0B | Inconsistency found in specification |
audit:run9 |
#7057ff | Cross-section validity audit run 9 |
needs-triage |
#c5def5 | Awaiting triage |
type/bug |
#d73a4a | Something isn't working |
type/feature |
#0075ca | New feature or request |
type/docs |
#0075ca | Documentation updates |
type/enhancement |
#a2eeef | Improvement to existing feature |
priority/critical |
#b60205 | Must be fixed immediately |
type/chore |
#e4e669 | Maintenance and housekeeping |
type/refactor |
#d4c5f9 | Code refactoring |
priority/high |
#d93f0b | High priority |
priority/medium |
#fbca04 | Medium priority |
priority/low |
#0e8a16 | Low priority |
status/in-progress |
#0075ca | Work in progress |
status/triage |
#c5def5 | Needs triage |
status/blocked |
#b60205 | Blocked by dependency |
status/needs-review |
#fbca04 | Awaiting review |
status/wontfix |
#ffffff | Will not be addressed |
audit |
#d4c5f9 | Spec audit findings |
audit:run10 |
#c2e0c6 | Audit run 10 — cross-reference & quality |
zircote/ccpkg — 47 extra labels (note: has both `/` and `: ` naming patterns)
Notable extras include: spec, proposal, schema, host-adapter, component: agents/skills/hooks/mcp/lsp/instructions, host: claude-code/copilot/codex-cli/gemini-cli/opencode, website, registry, tooling, security, breaking-change, status: needs-discussion, status: ready, plus full set of type/, priority/, status/ legacy labels.
Other repositories — common extra label pattern
The following 15 labels appear as extras in most repositories (GitHub default labels + legacy /-separated labels):
bug, documentation, duplicate, enhancement, good first issue, help wanted, invalid, question, wontfix, type/bug, type/docs, type/enhancement, type/feature, type/chore, type/refactor, priority/critical, priority/high, priority/medium, priority/low, status/triage, status/blocked, status/in-progress, status/needs-review, status/wontfix
Repos with agentic-workflows extra label: .github, rlm-rs, MIF, lro-bench, ccpkg, documentation-review, adrscope, vscode-git-adr
Repos with automation extra label: sdlc-quality, rlm-rs, documentation-review
Fully Consistent Repositories
0 repositories at 100% consistency
No repositories are at 100% consistency. All 22 repos require migration to the canonical taxonomy naming convention.
Recommended Action
Run the label sync workflow for all managed repos to adopt the canonical taxonomy:
for repo in .github github-project-manager sdlc-quality homebrew-tap atlatl atlatl-spec \
rlm-rs MIF subcog lro-bench daedalus ccpkg refactor human-voice rlm-rs-plugin \
memory-capture-plugin documentation-review adr adrscope git-adr structured-madr vscode-git-adr; do
npx github-label-sync --access-token $GITHUB_TOKEN --labels labels.yml zircote/$repo
doneOr trigger: gh workflow run sync-labels.yml -f repo=zircote/REPO
Generated by housekeeping-labels workflow — https://github.com/zircote/.github/actions/runs/23149280388
Generated by Housekeeping: Label Audit · ◷