v4.36.1

Fixed — the measurement counted the source list as analysis

The acceptance bar takes three numbers off a published DOCX, and the script that
took them split the body from the tail on
參考文獻|參考資料|References|來源清單|Sources — every heading except the one this
pipeline actually emits, which is 資料來源. So the split never fired: three
consecutive runs measured their own generated source list as body text and
reported a body share of 100%, which is a threshold nothing can fail. Measured
properly the same three documents are 74.5%, 66.9% and 71.0%, and their body
figure counts drop from 1200/937/799 to 1050/777/668.

scripts/measure_report_body_density.py now does it, and takes the heading from
SOURCE_LIST_HEADING/SOURCE_LIST_HEADING_ZH rather than a list retyped beside
them, so renaming the heading breaks a test instead of quietly restoring a
perfect score. A document with no recognised tail heading is reported as such
rather than shown as a clean 100% — a missing source list and an unknown heading
give the same number and are not the same thing.

Fixed — a repeated figure outvoted the citation that stated it

The content gate counts a check as failed only when no cited evidence satisfied
it, which is what lets a claim rest on the union of its sources. The counter
incremented once per finding rather than once per evidence, and a claim naming
two bands — 「0–10 則」 and 「10–50 則」 — states the number 10 twice. Against two
citations, the single failing one contributed two votes and reached the
threshold alone, so the claim was blocked while the other citation was stating
the figure outright. It only ever affected multi-citation claims, which is
precisely the case the union rule exists to protect.