Skip to content

chore: use local data for ntx builder datastore impl#2166

Closed
SantiagoPittella wants to merge 3 commits into
nextfrom
santiagopittella-ntx-builder-datastore
Closed

chore: use local data for ntx builder datastore impl#2166
SantiagoPittella wants to merge 3 commits into
nextfrom
santiagopittella-ntx-builder-datastore

Conversation

@SantiagoPittella
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Will delete the RPC part after #2162 gets merged.

This moves the DataStore implementation for the ntx builder to be local-first

@SantiagoPittella SantiagoPittella added the no changelog This PR does not require an entry in the `CHANGELOG.md` file label Jun 1, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we need RPC for FPI?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, because it can be a non-network account, and we need the global inclusion proof

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry I meant are the methods below not for FPI at all?

Comment thread bin/ntx-builder/src/actor/execute.rs Outdated
)));
}

let vault = self.account.vault();
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we check the vault root here?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry I meant are the methods below not for FPI at all?

@SantiagoPittella
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Closing in favor of #2162

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

no changelog This PR does not require an entry in the `CHANGELOG.md` file

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants