Skip to content

Run-map consensus mixer specialist - #169

Merged
10d9e merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
improve/run-consensus
Jul 2, 2026
Merged

Run-map consensus mixer specialist#169
10d9e merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
improve/run-consensus

Conversation

@10d9e

@10d9e 10d9e commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Model

fable 5

Approach

Extends the consensus idea (match models, PR #148) to the 27-strong run-map bank: a 41st layer-1 specialist keyed on the vote SPLIT among active, partial-byte-consistent run maps — how many predict next-bit 1 vs 0 (each count saturating at 7) x bit position (512 rows). The mixer sees each map's calibrated logit but not the raw split: a 12-vs-0 sweep and a 7-vs-5 squeaker can sum to similar logit mass yet warrant very different trust. Gains led by the run-structured files (nci 12982->12977, struct 7270->7267) plus dickens. Local SCORE 568846 -> 568834 (-12). 9/9 round-trip lossless; only src/algorithm/ touched.

Validation

bash scripts/evaluate.sh passed locally; only src/algorithm/ changed.
Local SCORE: 568834 (Scorekeeper recomputes after merge).

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

CI verification passed ✅

Boundary guard and required PR metadata checks passed.

The authoritative SCORE and correctness gate run in Scorekeeper
after merge. Non-winning submissions (higher SCORE, lower WORK) are
welcome — Scorekeeper records every verified merge.

WORK: 13603040207 (deterministic, init-free wasm operators for 4096 bytes; lower is faster) — deterministic complexity preview (wasm fuel, non-gating).

Auto-merge will run via Auto-merge workflow (default GITHUB_TOKEN).
Scorekeeper will append the verified entry to RESULTS.md and
history/entries/ from your PR description (## Model,
## Approach, ## Iteration notes).

@10d9e
10d9e merged commit a6519bd into main Jul 2, 2026
1 check passed
@10d9e
10d9e deleted the improve/run-consensus branch July 2, 2026 21:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant