Skip to content

docs(downloader): fix javadoc link that broke the v0.9.0 release#77

Merged
nixel2007 merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
claude/github-issue-31-review-g8hz79
Jul 8, 2026
Merged

docs(downloader): fix javadoc link that broke the v0.9.0 release#77
nixel2007 merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
claude/github-issue-31-review-g8hz79

Conversation

@nixel2007

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Что и зачем

Публикация релиза v0.9.0 в Maven Central упала на задаче :javadoc:

BslLanguageServerDownloader.java: error: reference not found
 * ... не чаще одного раза в {@link #checkInterval} и скачивают

В javadoc класса осталась ссылка {@link #checkInterval} на поле, которое было заменено на константу DEFAULT_CHECK_INTERVAL (в рамках #76). Обычный CI PR не собирает javadoc-jar, поэтому ошибка проявилась только на релизной задаче — из-за чего 0.9.0 так и не опубликовался (в Maven Central сейчас 404).

Изменение

  • Ссылка {@link #checkInterval}{@link #DEFAULT_CHECK_INTERVAL}.

Проверка

  • ./gradlew javadoc — проходит (та самая задача, что падала на релизе); остаются только прежние не-фатальные warning'и делобмок-классов.

После мержа релиз 0.9.0 (или новый патч) можно перевыпустить — тогда позеленеет и сборка плагина intellij-language-1c-bsl#32, которая ждёт utils 0.9.0 в Maven Central.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01CXTAaR4opi34idMG7ZZ8BV


Generated by Claude Code

The class javadoc still referenced {@link #checkInterval} after the field was
replaced by the DEFAULT_CHECK_INTERVAL constant, so the release's javadoc task
failed with "reference not found" and v0.9.0 never published to Maven Central.
Point the link at DEFAULT_CHECK_INTERVAL. Verified with `gradlew javadoc`.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CXTAaR4opi34idMG7ZZ8BV
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@nixel2007, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 40 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 2141b90d-8ec3-44ac-889f-876b2c50037d

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7abc027 and d8436fc.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/main/java/com/github/_1c_syntax/utils/downloader/BslLanguageServerDownloader.java
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch claude/github-issue-31-review-g8hz79

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@sonarqubecloud

sonarqubecloud Bot commented Jul 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@nixel2007 nixel2007 merged commit a46d9c6 into master Jul 8, 2026
15 checks passed
@nixel2007 nixel2007 deleted the claude/github-issue-31-review-g8hz79 branch July 8, 2026 04:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants