ports: Implement access syscall in mlibc sysdeps#3
Merged
Conversation
Owner
|
Yep, I confirmed that it works, thank you! :) |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR replaces the stub for the
accesssystem call in the zigux mlibc sysdeps with a basic implementation that returns 0 if the file exists. It ignores file permissions, but fully implementingaccessshould be trivial when file permissions are implemented in zigux by simply computing the correct return value based onstatbuf.st_mode.I wasn't able to get zig and jinx working on my system to test if this works (or even compiles), but in theory, this should resolve #2.