release: v1.0.0

[9thLevelSoftware]

Summary

[Copilot]

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

[kilo-code-bot]

Code Review Roast 🔥

Verdict: No Issues Found | Recommendation: Merge

Oh wait, this PR is actually clean. I had my flamethrower warmed up and everything — six files, ~100 changed lines, and not a single thing to torch. A release prep that's just version bumps + coherent documentation updates? In this economy? Pull the other one.

Honestly: bumping 0.1.1 → 1.0.0 cleanly across workspace, lock, CHANGELOG, README status, and VERSIONING.md without leaving any of them out of sync is the kind of boring correctness that prevents 3 AM pages. The new [1.0.0] CHANGELOG section properly mirrors the release highlights + known-limitations structure (cosign optional, Homebrew/WinGet not published, split-agent F5 accepted) instead of being a wall of marketing fluff. VERSIONING.md flipped the pre-1.0 → from-1.0.0 wording accurately. README's "production-ready release" + simplified "(not 24×7 SLA)" Rota line is honest.

V1_READINESS.md did the hard part: Q1/Q2/Q3 status flipped to Pass with concrete evidence (release commit, tag-time issue check, workspace 1.0.0 + CHANGELOG section), the residual-Must list collapsed from three items to "none for field + versioning," and the implication dropped its "prefer messaging until tag" hedge. That's how a readiness doc should land at the moment the release lands — not six months stale, not hedging forever.

Verdict

Approve. Mechanical, coherent, no correctness/safety issues, no security concerns, no broken tests, no abstractions to delete.

Correctness / Safety Findings

No correctness or safety findings.

Ponytail Review

Ponytail: Lean already. Ship.

Ponytail net: 0 lines.

Suggested Minimal Patch

No patch needed.

Final Merge Guidance

Can merge as-is. Tag push + release.yml will produce the actual GitHub Release assets; the checklist correctly leaves that row as [ ] (via release.yml on tag). The "Tag v1.0.0 from green CI commit" row is marked [x] in the checklist, which is consistent with this being the release PR that defines what gets tagged — minor pedantic point, not worth blocking on.

🏆 Best part: V1_READINESS.md — the implication got shorter, the residual Must list got shorter, and the Q-row evidence got more specific in the same diff. That's the rarest kind of docs change: net deletion + net clarity.

💀 Worst part: The PR body is literally just ## Summary with nothing under it. For a v1.0.0 release PR, that's a missed opportunity to give reviewers (and future grep archeologists) a one-line "this bumps X, updates Y, prepares tag Z" summary. Not a blocker — but you're one tab-completion away from fixing it.

📊 Overall: A tidy release prep. No smoke, no mirrors, no deflated abstractions hiding in the lockfile. Ship it, tag it, move on to the next fire.

Files Reviewed (6 files)

• CHANGELOG.md — new [1.0.0] section; prior [Unreleased] subsection content moved; empty [Unreleased] header retained (standard Keep a Changelog)
• Cargo.lock — three package versions 0.1.1 → 1.0.0
• Cargo.toml — workspace.version + tif-core workspace dep 0.1.1 → 1.0.0
• README.md — Status: "v0.1 production candidate" → "v1.0.0"; Rota note tightened
• docs/V1_READINESS.md — Q1/Q2/Q3 flipped to Pass with updated evidence; readiness checklist rows checked; residual Must → "none"; implication shortened
• docs/VERSIONING.md — version reference 0.1.0 → 1.0.0; pre-1.0 rule replaced with from-1.0.0 rule

Fix these issues in Kilo Cloud

---

_{Reviewed by minimax-m3 · Input: 28.7K · Output: 7K · Cached: 99.7K}

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 2c2890e32f

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Require v1.0.0 install verification before checking off

When the v1.0.0 release assets have not yet been published by the tag workflow, marking this step complete based on the v0.1.1-rc.1 dry-run makes the release gate pass without ever installing the actual GA archive and checksum set. If the tag build produces a missing or mismatched asset, the checklist now treats re-verification as optional, so users could get a broken default install path; leave this unchecked until install.sh and install.ps1 have been run against the v1.0.0 release assets.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.