Skip to content

plan: carry W0's verdict into the wave table (W2 blocked-by-OGAR-mint-decision, W1 proceeds) - #1029

Merged
AdaWorldAPI merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/w2-status-after-w0
Aug 25, 2026
Merged

plan: carry W0's verdict into the wave table (W2 blocked-by-OGAR-mint-decision, W1 proceeds)#1029
AdaWorldAPI merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/w2-status-after-w0

Conversation

@AdaWorldAPI

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

One commit, two table rows in .claude/plans/r2il-machine-semantic-contract-v1.md. No source change, no mint, no new decision.

Why this exists at all

#1028 recorded W0's verdict in its PR body. The plan's own wave table still showed W2 with its original gate — "gated on W0's verdict for the space axis" — which now reads as pending when it is in fact blocked. A future session reading the plan alone, which is the likeliest path, would have walked into the blocked axis without ever seeing the cone.

§0 of that same document argues that status belongs in the register that claims to hold status. This is that argument applied to the document itself.

W2 → ⛔ BLOCKED-BY-OGAR-MINT-DECISION

The row now states the change of kind, not just a flag: the gate is no longer "W0 decides how the space axis is carved" but "the custom axis must not enter the mint in its current carving at all" — the lo-u16 is a rank inside a table the classid never names, and two arches collide byte-identically (E-W0-THE-SPACE-ORDINAL-IS-A-RANK-RELATIVE-TO-A-TABLE-THE-CLASSID-NEVER-NAMES-1).

Deliberately bounded so the cone stops no more traffic than it should:

  • Fixed spaces 0–3 are unaffected and stay — architecture-invariant by construction.
  • Container concepts that do not touch the space axis are not blocked.
  • The three repair options (arch in the address / raw SLEIGH identity / custom space outside the classid) are named as undecided, not chosen — that remains an OGAR mint decision, and this PR does not pre-empt it.
  • The falsifier column is honest about the split: the original test still governs the concept half; for the space half the block is the verdict, not a test to re-run.

W1 → MAY PROCEED

Independently of W0's verdict, with the one condition stated inline: where its carving work does touch the custom-space axis, it inherits W2's block.

Test plan

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01AGVLyRZNEKKBSfBDJfbY3V


Generated by Claude Code

The follow-on status lived only in PR #1028's body, so a session reading
the plan alone -- the likeliest path -- would have seen W2 with its
original gate and walked straight into the blocked axis. Section 0 of
this same document argues against exactly that kind of drift, so the
status belongs in the register that claims to hold status.

W2 is marked blocked-by-OGAR-mint-decision, with the change of kind
spelled out: the gate is no longer 'W0 decides how the space axis is
carved' but 'the custom axis must not enter the mint in this carving at
all'. The three undecided repair options are named, fixed spaces 0-3 are
noted as unaffected, and container concepts that never touch the space
axis are explicitly not blocked, so the cone does not stop more traffic
than it should. W1 is marked may-proceed with the one condition under
which it inherits the block.
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

  • 🔍 Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: fad7316f-1430-4fca-ae33-c43ed235b8d6


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@AdaWorldAPI
AdaWorldAPI marked this pull request as ready for review August 25, 2026 17:10
@cursor

cursor Bot commented Aug 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Bugbot couldn't run - usage limit reached

Bugbot is counted against Cursor usage for this user or team, and this run hit a usage or spend limit.

A user or team admin can review and increase usage limits in the Cursor dashboard.

(requestId: serverGenReqId_29cb0b96-9500-421d-9137-4eb70f2ab02e)

@AdaWorldAPI
AdaWorldAPI merged commit eec1cab into main Aug 25, 2026
1 of 2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants