[codex] Add atomic edit format and DeepSeek V4 Pro polyglot result - #5282
Open
danielgonzagat wants to merge 61 commits into
Open
[codex] Add atomic edit format and DeepSeek V4 Pro polyglot result#5282danielgonzagat wants to merge 61 commits into
danielgonzagat wants to merge 61 commits into
Conversation
|
|
danielgonzagat
marked this pull request as ready for review
June 19, 2026 00:43
…ntation) Removes the test-error reflection augmentation that injected hidden test source into the model's retry prompt. base_coder.py now matches upstream; the benchmark passes the raw test output through. Scores are comparable to the official harness.
danielgonzagat
force-pushed
the
bench/deepseek-v4-pro-polyglot-result
branch
from
June 19, 2026 02:33
17b385d to
f39118c
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This PR adds the atomic whole-file edit format work and supporting benchmark/runtime changes used to run an official polyglot benchmark at scale. It also adds the resulting DeepSeek V4 Pro entry to
aider/website/_data/polyglot_leaderboard.yml.The submitted leaderboard row reports:
212/225passing on try 2,94.2%82/225passing on try 1,36.4%DeepSeek V4 Proaider --model deepseek/deepseek-v4-proatomicc4d9f232026-06-18Benchmark Evidence
The full run was executed as a Modal sharded polyglot run, one shard per language, using the same model, edit format, commit hash, and polyglot benchmark ref.
atomic-deepseek-v4-pro-polyglot-context-c4d9f23-official-r117e0611e77b54e2dea774cdc0aa00cf9f7ed6144f.aider.results.jsonfiles downloaded from the Modal volumeShard summaries:
24/2636/3944/4746/4933/3429/30Aggregate failures:
cpp/bank-account,cpp/meetup,go/connect,go/counter,go/robot-simulator,java/forth,java/rational-numbers,java/sgf-parsing,javascript/complex-numbers,javascript/list-ops,javascript/rational-numbers,python/forth,rust/forth.Validation
Local verification on the PR branch:
.venv/bin/python -m pytest tests/basic/test_coder.py tests/basic/test_wholefile.py tests/basic/test_linter.py benchmark/test_benchmark.py benchmark/test_modal_runner.py -q->121 passed, 1 skipped, 29 subtests passed.venv/bin/python -m py_compile aider/coders/base_coder.py tests/basic/test_coder.py benchmark/benchmark.py benchmark/modal_runner.pygit diff --checkyaml.safe_load()pass_num_2=212,pass_rate_2=94.2bundle exec jekyll buildwas attempted locally but the local Ruby environment does not havejekyllinstalled (bundler: command not found: jekyll).