Skip to content

docs: genericize README — capabilities over deployment specifics - #183

Merged
AlienWalker1995 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/readme-generic
Aug 19, 2026
Merged

docs: genericize README — capabilities over deployment specifics#183
AlienWalker1995 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/readme-generic

Conversation

@AlienWalker1995

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

The README read like one specific deployment's runbook: the port map appeared in four separate sections (Overview, Features, Security, the architecture diagram), plus migration artifacts (legacy-bookmark 302 notes, webhook-URL continuity) and env-var plumbing that only matter to an existing install.

Changes:

  • Features rewritten capability-first (what the stack gives you), no port annotations
  • Overview keeps the deployment model (single operator, SSO front door, bring-your-own tailnet/OAuth) without the port enumeration; concrete layout is already documented in the operator guide and auth runbook
  • Security deduplicated (principles only)
  • ASCII architecture diagram replaced with mermaid (renders natively on GitHub); added a second small mermaid for the render pipeline
  • Tone: ${CADDY_TAILNET_HOSTNAME} → "your tailnet hostname"-style phrasing; Hermes described as "an included default assistant"

No information is lost: the per-port table remains in docs/operator-guide.md (§ports) and docs/deployment-models.md.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

The README carried one specific deployment's mechanics: the per-port map
repeated in four sections, legacy-bookmark migration notes, webhook-URL
continuity remarks, and env-var plumbing. Features are now capability-led,
the deployment model is described generically (the concrete port layout
stays documented in the operator guide and auth runbook), and the ASCII
architecture diagram is replaced with mermaid diagrams (architecture +
render pipeline) that GitHub renders natively.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@AlienWalker1995
AlienWalker1995 merged commit e4fff49 into main Aug 19, 2026
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant