Codex auth#156
Merged
Merged
Conversation
07cb587 to
f7d2bdc
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
just saw the test is failing will check when I'm back |
Contributor
Author
fixed |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Codex triggers an interctive auth message if the credentials are not found. This patch makes it raise an Exception instead. Tenacity is a dependency used by retries. We could avoid using that, but then the patch would be uglier and considering we might migrate into fastllm soon I though it was a decent trade-off.