Repository navigation
Engineering design 3
Anukrat edited this page Sep 25, 2018
·
8 revisions
- User Friendly
- Time
- Cost
- Folding
- Compact
| Objectives | Weightage |
|---|---|
| Folding | 7 |
| Compact | 4 |
| User Friendly | 5 |
| Time | 6 |
| Cost | 6 |
| Objectives | Concept 1 | Concept 2 | Concept 3 | Concept 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Folding | + | datum | + | + |
| Compact | - | datum | + | - |
| User Friendly | + | datum | - | + |
| Time | - | datum | + | - |
| Cost | - | datum | ++ | 0 |
| + score | 12 | 0 | 23 | 11 |
| - score | 16 | 0 | 5 | 10 |
| Total | -4 | 0 | 18 | 1 |
| Concept no. | Objectives | Scores Given | Justification |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Folding | + | In this concept, the folding is not done properly as compared to other concepts |
| Compact | - | As we can see in the figure its not as compact that we want as per the problem definition | |
| User Friendly | + | It is more user friendly as it can be operated with only one switch | |
| Time | - | It takes more time as it have to spiral folding | |
| Cost | - | Because of many gears and motors and all the framework,its cost is higher | |
| 2 | Folding | datum | |
| Compact | datum | ||
| User Friendly | datum | ||
| Time | datum | ||
| Cost | datum | ||
| 3 | Folding | + | It rolls the cloth without causing any damage and maintaining its originality |
| Compact | + | It is compact | |
| User Friendly | - | It is not as easy to operate as compared | |
| Time | + | It takes few seconds to complete the process | |
| Cost | ++ | It is economical to afford | |
| 4 | Folding | + | It folds according to the pattern as given |
| Compact | - | It requires more space to operate | |
| User Friendly | + | It is easier to use | |
| Time | - | It consumes more time as compared to others | |
| Cost | 0 | It costs similar to concept 3 |