You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Goal. A deterministic, rule-based, transparent root-cause reasoner over the E2 four-lens operational graph that turns a symptom into a ranked, evidence-cited set of root-cause hypotheses and a suggested remediation plan — the capability that makes Sith more than a fleet viewer. It proposes, never executes: advisory in the local wedge (a suggested command / PR diff the user runs), a governed typed-intent proposal through the PEP (E4/E5) in the hub. One brain, two modes.
Phase / milestone. Center of gravity P1 (the deterministic brain needs E2's four-lens graph). A local advisory subset ships in Phase L (see child, over locally-reachable lenses); the governed-plan behaviour lands with the write path (P2/P3).
Why this is now a first-class epic (research)
docs/research/MARKET-RESEARCH-2026-07.md §2D/§6 (theme T2): the entire 2026 AI-SRE / auto-triage wave — k8sgpt, HolmesGPT, Robusta, Botkube, Komodor/Klaudia, Cleric — converges on one shape: LLM-agentic, investigate/advise, read-only or action-gated. None ships deterministic rule-based root-cause; none ships governed typed action. Two structural openings fall out, and E14 occupies both:
Deterministic root-cause is unoccupied in OSS. Every serious tool routes root-cause through an LLM. Sith's rule-based brain is offline, reproducible, explainable, needs no model or data egress — credible to security-conscious / air-gapped / China estates that cannot send cluster telemetry to an LLM. Position it as deterministic, not "our AI is better."
The action gap the AI-SRE tools admit to is Sith's moat. They all stop at "here's the fix"; Sith's answer to "and now safely do it" is typed-intent + PR-first + multi-approver + abstention + signed dispatch + per-spoke re-validation — and Sith can be the governed MCP server these very agents call (→ E7 E7: Governed MCP server #25, E4 E4: Action federation #22).
The determinism / positioning contract (hard requirements)
Rule-based and transparent, not a black box — every hypothesis names the exact signals that raised it and the evidence that validated it. No LLM in the critical path; an LLM is an optional client, never the engine.
Proposes, never executes — output is a plan, gated downstream. No autonomy (the Replit database-deletion lesson).
Reads the graph; adds no data source — all evidence flows through the same connector verbs and the same freshness/coverage rules.
Honest about coverage — a missing/stale required lens ⇒ abstain on the dependent hypothesis with the missing lens named, never a false-confident verdict. Sith would rather say "I don't know" than guess — the trust differentiator over autonomy-first tools.
The pipeline
symptom → scope → evidence → hypotheses → validation → plan (spec §3.2). The brain consumes the four read verbs (discover/read/query/diff) and emits a plan; it never calls execute (owned by the PEP, E4/E5).
F14.5 — Local advisory renderer (Phase L) — plan → suggested kubectl/PR diff the user runs. (→ child issue, ships Phase L.)
F14.6 — Governed-plan renderer (hub) — plan → typed-intent proposal routed to the PEP (E4/E5); advisory and governed share the same rules, differ only in plan rendering + gating.
F14.7 — Fixtures/replay harness so rule-weight changes are regression-tested against a corpus of real incidents (spec §7.2 open decision 4).
Adjacent rules as coverage lands: ImagePullBackOff, FailingDependency, Pipeline/SyncFailure, HPA-thrash, PVC-full — the schema admits them without change.
Connector → rule coverage (spec §4.3)
With only the Wave-1 core (Kubernetes + Argo + GitHub + Prometheus + a log store), R1/R2/R4/R5/R6 reach a confident verdict and R3 reaches detect (needs a log connector for confidence). This is why W1 is the daily core — it is exactly the coverage the six rules need (→ E12 #30 wave matrix).
Exit criteria (spec §6.2)
The pipeline runs end-to-end over the graph for at least R1–R6.
Each of R1–R6 produces, on a seeded fixture, the correct top hypothesis with cited signals and a suggested plan naming only closed-vocabulary intents (or an advisory command in local mode).
Cause-of chaining works (CrashLoop caused by a bad deploy reports R1 as root cause of R3, attaches R1's plan).
Coverage gate / abstention: with a required lens made stale/absent, the dependent hypothesis is reported unconfirmed with the missing lens named.
Fleet correlation dominates: when the same cause spans ≥ 2 clusters, the fleet-wide hypothesis outranks per-cluster.
The brain never calls execute — verified by the seam (no execute code path in brain).
Local vs hub: the identical rule set yields an advisory command in local mode and a typed-intent proposal routed to the PEP in hub mode.
Open decisions carried from spec §7.2
Brain placement — recommendation adopted: E14 owns the reasoner; E2 F2.6/F2.7 own the graph substrate (E2: Read federation #20).
Local telemetry reachability — opt-in endpoint + best-effort API-proxy discovery to in-cluster Prom/Loki; abstain cleanly when absent.
Timeline ring size — small fixed window (last N events / 24–72h), not a series; tune against real incidents.
Rule weights — indicative in the spec; tune via the F14.7 replay harness.
Node/cluster remediation (R6) — outside the v1 closed vocabulary; advisory now, a cloud-scoped typed verb is a later E4 decision.
Goal. A deterministic, rule-based, transparent root-cause reasoner over the E2 four-lens operational graph that turns a symptom into a ranked, evidence-cited set of root-cause hypotheses and a suggested remediation plan — the capability that makes Sith more than a fleet viewer. It proposes, never executes: advisory in the local wedge (a suggested command / PR diff the user runs), a governed typed-intent proposal through the PEP (E4/E5) in the hub. One brain, two modes.
Spec.
docs/specs/E2-readfed-brain-integrations.md§3 (PR #43). Depends on E2 (four-lens graph, #20 · F2.6/F2.7), E12 (connector coverage, #30), E4/E5 (governed-plan hand-off in hub mode, #22/#23). Substrate keys: OpenTelemetry Kubernetes semantic conventions (§2.3).Phase / milestone. Center of gravity P1 (the deterministic brain needs E2's four-lens graph). A local advisory subset ships in Phase L (see child, over locally-reachable lenses); the governed-plan behaviour lands with the write path (P2/P3).
Why this is now a first-class epic (research)
docs/research/MARKET-RESEARCH-2026-07.md§2D/§6 (theme T2): the entire 2026 AI-SRE / auto-triage wave — k8sgpt, HolmesGPT, Robusta, Botkube, Komodor/Klaudia, Cleric — converges on one shape: LLM-agentic, investigate/advise, read-only or action-gated. None ships deterministic rule-based root-cause; none ships governed typed action. Two structural openings fall out, and E14 occupies both:The determinism / positioning contract (hard requirements)
plan, gated downstream. No autonomy (the Replit database-deletion lesson).The pipeline
symptom → scope → evidence → hypotheses → validation → plan(spec §3.2). The brain consumes the four read verbs (discover/read/query/diff) and emits aplan; it never callsexecute(owned by the PEP, E4/E5).Features
Rule/Signal/PlanTemplate, spec §3.3): weighted signals per lens,NeedsLenses/NeedsVerbscoverage gates,CauseOfchaining.kubectl/PR diff the user runs. (→ child issue, ships Phase L.)ImagePullBackOff,FailingDependency,Pipeline/SyncFailure,HPA-thrash,PVC-full— the schema admits them without change.Connector → rule coverage (spec §4.3)
With only the Wave-1 core (Kubernetes + Argo + GitHub + Prometheus + a log store), R1/R2/R4/R5/R6 reach a confident verdict and R3 reaches detect (needs a log connector for confidence). This is why W1 is the daily core — it is exactly the coverage the six rules need (→ E12 #30 wave matrix).
Exit criteria (spec §6.2)
execute— verified by the seam (no execute code path inbrain).Open decisions carried from spec §7.2
EntityRefcanonicalization — OTel semconv attribute names as canonical keys (T5).Source:
docs/specs/E2-readfed-brain-integrations.md(PR #43) ·docs/research/MARKET-RESEARCH-2026-07.md(T2). Child: local advisory subset (Phase L). Related: #20 (E2 graph), #30 (E12 coverage), #22 (E4), #23 (E5), #25 (E7).