Skip to content

BL-2353 Fix image width on xmatter to use full width#567

Merged
hatton merged 1 commit intoBloomBooks:masterfrom
gmartin7:BL-2353CoverImageWidth
Jun 19, 2015
Merged

BL-2353 Fix image width on xmatter to use full width#567
hatton merged 1 commit intoBloomBooks:masterfrom
gmartin7:BL-2353CoverImageWidth

Conversation

@gmartin7
Copy link
Contributor

  • Fix BL-1022 in basePage.less was overridden by xmatter css
    which have wider relative marginBox margins
  • also changed capitalization on @import to match actual
    DistFiles folder name (in case we build less->css on linux
    someday)
  • NB: all 'real' changes are to .less files

* Fix BL-1022 in basePage.less was overridden by xmatter css
   which have wider relative marginBox margins
* also changed capitalization on @import to match actual
   DistFiles folder name (in case we build less->css on linux
   someday)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't see why this one is 2*@MarginOuter rather than @MarginOuter + @MarginInner. I think a comment is indicated.
Is there another case for something like @MarginEven when they are balanced?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The comment on line 20 is pre-existing:
//Just center the margin box, (for now, we're ignoring the binding)
Probably because it's not in publishmode yet.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We are intentionally just centering the cover, as binding has little or no effect on the cover.

hatton added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2015
BL-2353 Fix image width on xmatter to use full width
@hatton hatton merged commit 6fb3b03 into BloomBooks:master Jun 19, 2015
@gmartin7 gmartin7 deleted the BL-2353CoverImageWidth branch June 19, 2015 22:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants