fix weekly website auto update workflows#26
Conversation
|
🚀 Preview deployed: https://codex/weekly-auto-update-workflows.capacitor-tutorial.pages.dev |
|
@coderabbitai review |
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 19 minutes and 41 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file). ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based credits. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan refill rate. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, the refill rate gradually slows as usage increases. The highest same-day bursts are limited more strictly. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (5)
Comment |
✅ Action performedReview finished.
|
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: ad2fd9c150
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
🚀 Preview deployed: https://codex/weekly-auto-update-workflows.capacitor-tutorial.pages.dev |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 84e81f0169
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| exit 1 | ||
| } | ||
| git push origin main | ||
| gh workflow run deploy.yml --ref main |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fresh evidence for a remaining GITHUB_TOKEN path is that scripts/generate_tutorials.mjs commits and git push origin main -f every 100 generated tutorials before this step. If a run ends on one of those checkpoints (for example exactly 100 or 200 new tutorials), git-check reports no changes, so this conditional step—and this workflow_dispatch—is skipped; GitHub documents that non-dispatch events created with GITHUB_TOKEN do not create workflow runs (https://docs.github.com/actions/using-workflows/triggering-a-workflow#triggering-a-workflow-from-a-workflow), leaving that generated tutorial commit undeployed.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
1 participant
Summary
Weekly chain
Local verification