This repository was archived by the owner on Jan 26, 2023. It is now read-only.
Replies: 3 comments
-
This is correct I believe. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
Duplicate of #198 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
@Joeventi Your other understandings are correct. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Wanted to clarify all the previous questions and my understanding.
Say we have Input Engines A, B, and C.
When A processes an exit, A would stop executing any further actions. B and C will continue inputting their actions until they process an exit themselves.
However, for wins, if A won the game, regardless of Free Race and Round Robin, all the input engines would stop processing inputs.
This is consistent regardless of the number of actions each input engine is supposed to process.
In addition, do exits have to be processed immediately as well?
Currently, my implementation goes like this:
When A reaches an exit, it waits until B and C also reaches an exit. Then they will all process exits as their next action.
Ex.
A : J J E
B : K K K E
C : L L L E
Assuming A reaches exit first, expected in round robin and possible in free race, my implementation would wait until B processes all three K's and C processes all 3 L's before all of them processes the final E action.
Is this correct?
Sorry for the lengthy post, but is my understanding correct?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions